The carbon cost of inappropriate endoscopy
- PMID: 37673197
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.08.018
The carbon cost of inappropriate endoscopy
Abstract
Background and aims: Digestive endoscopy is a resource-intensive activity with a conspicuous carbon footprint and an estimated rate of inappropriateness. However, the carbon costs of inappropriate endoscopic procedures still remain obscure. Here we evaluated the environmental impact of inappropriate endoscopic examinations.
Methods: We calculated the carbon cost of a standard endoscopic procedure (EGD and colonoscopy [CLS]), taking into account the items (eg, disposable materials, personal protective equipment) and energy required for the endoscopy procedure itself and the cleaning process. The rates of inappropriateness and the mortality cost of carbon (MCC) of endoscopic examinations in different scenarios were calculated.
Results: EGD and CLS presented a carbon cost of 5.43 kg and 6.71 kg of CO2, respectively. Different scenarios were evaluated, according to the number of endoscopic procedures performed in Italy per 1000 inhabitants and the reported data on their inappropriateness. The carbon cost of inappropriate EGD and CLS in Italy was 4133 CO2 metric tons per year (MCC, .93), ranging from 3527 to 4749, and equivalent to 1,760,446 L of gasoline consumed. Applying the same data to the European population, the estimated carbon footprint of inappropriate digestive endoscopy in Europe was 30,804 metric tons.
Conclusions: The environmental impact of inappropriate endoscopic procedures in Europe is remarkable. These results highlight the need to adopt novel strategies aimed at reducing both the carbon footprint of digestive endoscopy and the rate of inappropriate procedures.
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure All authors disclosed no financial relationships. Research support for this study was provided in part by the Italian Ministry of Health–Current Research IRCCS for authors from the Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico-Milano.
Comment on
-
Systematic review with meta-analysis: the appropriateness of colonoscopy increases the probability of relevant findings and cancer while reducing unnecessary exams.Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):22-32. doi: 10.1111/apt.16144. Epub 2020 Nov 7. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021. PMID: 33159359
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources