Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 20:3:1031338.
doi: 10.3389/fneph.2023.1031338. eCollection 2023.

Frailty as a dynamic process in a diverse cohort of older persons with dialysis-dependent CKD

Affiliations

Frailty as a dynamic process in a diverse cohort of older persons with dialysis-dependent CKD

Nancy G Kutner et al. Front Nephrol. .

Abstract

This study examines frailty status evolution observed in a two-year follow-up of a cohort of older persons (age ≥65) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) treatment. Frailty, a geriatric syndrome that connotes a state of low physiologic reserve and vulnerability to stressors, is associated with increased risk for multiple adverse health outcomes in studies of persons with CKD as well as older persons in the general population. The Fried frailty index defines frailty as the presence of 3 or more of 5 indicators-recent unintentional weight loss, slowed gait speed, decreased muscle strength, self-reported exhaustion, and low physical activity. In the seminal work by Fried and colleagues, persons who were characterized by 1-2 of the Fried index criteria were termed "pre-frail" and considered at risk for subsequently becoming frail, potentially providing insight regarding intervention targets that might slow or prevent individuals' transition from pre-frail to frail status. Other less frequently studied types of transitions may also be informative, including "recovery or reversion" (improvement) by people whose longitudinal assessments indicate movement from frailty to prefrailty or robust, or from prefrailty to robust. These status changes are also a potential source of insights relevant for prevention or remediation of frailty, but research focusing on the various ways that individuals may transition between frailty states over time remains limited, and no previous research has examined varying patterns of frailty status evolution in an older cohort of persons with dialysis-dependent CKD. In a study cohort of dialysis-dependent older persons, we characterized patterns of frailty status evolution by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and treatment vintage; by longitudinal profiles of non-sedentary behavior; and by self-report indicators relevant for dimensions emphasized in the Age-Friendly 4Ms Health System (What Matters, Mobility, Mentation). Our study suggests that strategies to promote resiliency among older persons with dialysis-dependent CKD can be informed not only by frailty status transition that indicates improvement over time but also by older adults' maintenance of (stable) robust status over time, and we concur that inclusion of both frailty and resilience measures is needed in future longitudinal studies and clinical trials.

Keywords: 4MS; chronic kidney disease; frailty; hemodialysis; older persons; resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
THE “4MS” FRAMEWORK. An Age-Friendly Health System is one in which every older adult’s care: Is guided by an essential set of evidence-based practices (the 4Ms); Causes no harms; and Is consistent with What Matters to the older adult and their family.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Derivation of Study Cohort: Older Persons with Dialysis-dependent CKD. 745 AAS participants were evaluated for frailty at a baseline assessment. a. ↓ → 217 of whom were aged ≥65 years ↔ No frailty assessment at 24 months (86). 44 died or withdrew from dialysisc. 24 changed modality or clinic. 18 miscellaneous other reasons. b. ↓ → 131 evaluated for frailty again at 24 months post-baseline →→ Study Cohort. AAS, ACTIVE-ADIPOSE Study a. Kutner et al. (7). b. Miscellaneous other reasons were observed for 18 participants: cognitive impairment; cancer; “too sick”; study withdrawal. c. Baseline frailty status of these 44 participants who died (n=41) or withdrew from dialysis (n=3): Robust=3; Pre-frail=23; Frail=18.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. . Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol. (2001) 56A:M146–56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuchel GA. Frailty and resilience as outcome measures in clinical trials and geriatric care: are we getting any closer? J Am Geriatr. Soc (2018) 66:1451–4. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15441 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roshanravan B. Is only seeing worth believing? Am J Kidney Dis (2014) 64(4):489–91. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.06.026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albert SM. The dynamics of frailty among older adults. JAMA Network Open (2019) 2(8):e198398.doi:10.1001. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8438 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Callahan KE. The future of frailty: opportunity is knocking. J Am Geriatr. Soc (2022) 70:2775–85. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17510 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources