Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;65(1):2-19.
doi: 10.1177/00221465231194043. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

Structural Sexism and Preventive Health Care Use in the United States

Affiliations

Structural Sexism and Preventive Health Care Use in the United States

Emily C Dore et al. J Health Soc Behav. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Preventive health care use can reduce the risk of disease, disability, and death. Thus, it is critical to understand factors that shape preventive care use. A growing body of research identifies structural sexism as a driver of population health, but it remains unknown if structural sexism is linked to preventive care use and, if so, whether the relationship differs for women and men. Gender performance and gendered power and resource allocation perspectives lead to competing hypotheses regarding these questions. This study explores the relationship between structural sexism and preventive care in gender-stratified, multilevel models that combine data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System with state-level data (N = 425,454). We find that in states with more structural sexism, both men and women were less likely to seek preventive care. These findings support the gender performance hypothesis for men and the gendered power and resource allocation hypothesis for men and women.

Keywords: gender inequality; health disparities; preventive health care; state context; structural sexism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Potential Relationships between Structural Sexism and Preventive Care Use Based on Gender Theories
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Associations between Structural Sexism and Odds of Using Preventive Health Care Services Among Women and Men

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asch Steven M., Kerr Eve A., Keesey Joan, Adams John L., Setodji Claude M., Malik Shaista, and McGlynn Elizabeth A. 2006. “Who Is at Greatest Risk for Receiving Poor-Quality Health Care?” New England Journal of Medicine 354(11):1147–56. doi: 10.1056/nejmsa044464. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barr Beth Allison. 2021. The Making of Biblical Womanhood: How the Subjugation of Women Became Gospel Truth. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Brazos Press.
    1. Beccia Ariel L., Austin S. Bryn, Baek Jonggyu, Agénor Madina, Forrester Sarah, Ding Eric Y., Jesdale William M., and Lapane Kate L. 2022. “Cumulative Exposure to State-Level Structural Sexism and Risk of Disordered Eating: Results from a 20-Year Prospective Cohort Study.” Social Science & Medicine 301:114956. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114956. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black Lindsey I., Nugent Colleen N., and Vahratian Anjel. 2016. “Access and Utilization of Selected Preventive Health Services Among Adolescents Aged 10-17.” NCHS Data Brief (246):1–8. - PubMed
    1. Blewett Lynn A., Pamela Jo Johnson Brian Lee, and Scal Peter B. 2008. “When a Usual Source of Care and Usual Provider Matter: Adult Prevention and Screening Services.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 23(9):1354–60. doi: 10.1007/S11606-008-0659-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources