Functionally discrete fine roots differ in microbial assembly, microbial functional potential, and produced metabolites
- PMID: 37675977
- DOI: 10.1111/pce.14705
Functionally discrete fine roots differ in microbial assembly, microbial functional potential, and produced metabolites
Abstract
Traditionally, fine roots were grouped using arbitrary size categories, rarely capturing the heterogeneity in physiology, morphology and functionality among different fine root orders. Fine roots with different functional roles are rarely separated in microbiome-focused studies and may result in confounding microbial signals and host-filtering across different root microbiome compartments. Using a 26-year-old common garden, we sampled fine roots from four temperate tree species that varied in root morphology and sorted them into absorptive and transportive fine roots. The rhizoplane and rhizosphere were characterized using 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer region amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics for the rhizoplane to identify potential microbial functions. Fine roots were subject to metabolomics to spatially characterize resource availability. Both fungi and bacteria differed according to root functional type. We observed additional differences between the bacterial rhizoplane and rhizosphere compartments for absorptive but not transportive fine roots. Rhizoplane bacteria, as well as the root metabolome and potential microbial functions, differed between absorptive and transportive fine roots, but not the rhizosphere bacteria. Functional differences were driven by sugar transport, peptidases and urea transport. Our data highlights the importance of root function when examining root-microbial relationships, emphasizing different host selective pressures imparted on different root microbiome compartments.
Keywords: microbial functions; rhizoplane; rhizosphere; root microbiome; root order; root physiology; spatial colonization.
© 2023 The Authors. Plant, Cell & Environment published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Anderson, M.J. & Walsh, D.C.I. (2013) PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: what null hypothesis are you testing? Ecological Monographs, 83(4), 557-574.
-
- Andrews, S. (2015). FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data[Onl ine].
-
- Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R. & Weber, L. (2015) Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 75, 129-137.
-
- Arkin, A.P., Cottingham, R.W., Henry, C.S., Harris, N.L., Stevens, R.L., Maslov, S. et al. (2018) KBase: the United States department of energy systems biology knowledgebase. Nature Biotechnology, 36(7), 566-569.
-
- Barka, E.A., Vatsa, P., Sanchez, L., Gaveau-Vaillant, N., Jacquard, C., Klenk, H.-P. et al. (2015) Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of actinobacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 80(1), 1-43.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources