Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jan;69(1):32-39.
doi: 10.1002/mus.27966. Epub 2023 Sep 7.

Measuring treatment adverse event burden in myasthenia gravis: Single-center prospective evaluation utilizing the Adverse Event Unit (AEU)

Affiliations
Observational Study

Measuring treatment adverse event burden in myasthenia gravis: Single-center prospective evaluation utilizing the Adverse Event Unit (AEU)

Michael K Hehir et al. Muscle Nerve. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction/aims: We developed a patient- and physician-weighted consensus unit called the adverse event unit (AEU) that quantifies and compares adverse event (AE) burden among any group of medications in neurological patients. In this study we evaluated preliminary validity and feasibility of measuring AE burden with the AEU in myasthenia gravis (MG).

Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, 1-year, observational study of adult MG patients presenting for routine care between April 1, 2021 and March 31, 2022. The MG Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), the 15-item MG Quality of Life revised (MG-QOL15r), MG-Composite, and AEU scores were obtained at all visits. A priori primary feasibility metric was AEU completion rate equal to (within 3.8%, one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]) or better than MG-ADL completion rate. Time to administer AEU and MG-ADL/MG-QOL15r, correlation between AEU total score and MG-QOL15r, and median AEU scores for each MG medication were evaluated.

Results: Fifty-four patients completed 67 study visits; side effects were reported at 75% of the visits. The study met the primary feasibility endpoint; AEU and MG-ADL were recorded at all visits. Times to administer the AEU (median 5 minutes) and MG-ADL/MG-QOL15r were similar. We observed a weak correlation of 0.29 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.51, P = .032) between AEU and MG-QOL15r scores. Non-statistically significant differences in median AEU scores were observed among MG medications.

Discussion: Our data demonstrate preliminary feasibility and validity of using the AEU to measure AE burden in MG. Future studies will compare AE burden among MG treatments and evaluate clinically meaningful AEU scores in MG.

Keywords: adverse events; complications; drug therapy; immunosuppressive agents; myasthenia gravis; side effects; therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Hehir MK, Punga AR, Ciafaloni E. Myasthenia gravis patient and physician opinions about immunosuppressant reduction. Muscle Nerve. 2020;61:767-772.
    1. Benatar M, Cutter G, Kaminski HJ. The best and worst of times in therapy development for myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2023;67:12-16.
    1. Hehir MK, Conaway M, Clark EM, et al. The adverse event unit (AEU): a novel metric to measure the burden of treatment adverse events. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0262109.
    1. Burns TM. The best of both worlds: using patient-reported plus physician-scored measures during the evaluation of myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve. 2016;53:3-4.
    1. Burns TM. Using disease-specific, patient-reported measures in everyday clinic. Neurology. 2016;87:858-859.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources