Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;12(2):380-391.
doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

Assessing Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Lessons Learned From Over 7,500 Transplants

Affiliations
Free article

Assessing Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Lessons Learned From Over 7,500 Transplants

Shahnawaz Amdani et al. JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Feb.
Free article

Abstract

Background: To date, no studies have identified an optimal metric to match donor-recipient (D-R) pairs in pediatric heart transplantation (HT).

Objectives: This study sought to identify size mismatch metrics that predicted graft survival post-HT.

Methods: D-R pairs undergoing HT in Pediatric Heart Transplant Society database from 1993 to 2021 were included. Effects of size mismatch by height, weight, body mass index, body surface area, predicted heart mass, and total cardiac volume (TCV) on 1- and 5-year graft survival and morbidity outcomes (rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy) were evaluated. Cox models with stepwise selection identified size metrics that independently predicted graft survival.

Results: Of 7,715 D-R pairs, 36.0% were well matched (D-R ratio: -20% to +20%) by weight, 39.0% by predicted heart mass, 50.0% by body surface area, 57.0% by body mass index, 71.0% by height, and 93.0% by TCV. Of all size metrics, only D-R mismatch by height and TCV predicted graft survival at 1 and 5 years. Effects of D-R size mismatch on graft survival were nonlinear. At both 1 and 5 years post-HT, D-R undersizing and oversizing by height led to increased graft loss, with graft loss observed more frequently with undersizing. Moderately undersized donors by height (D-R ratio: <-30%) frequently experienced rejection post-HT (P < 0.001). Assessing D-R size matching by TCV, minimal donor undersizing was protective, while oversizing up to 25% was not associated with increased graft loss.

Conclusions: In pediatric HT, D-R appear most optimally matched using TCV. Only D-R size mismatch by TCV and height independently predicts graft survival. Standardizing size matching across centers may reduce donor discard.

Keywords: heart transplant; pediatric; size mismatch.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Amdani is a site principal investigator for a multicenter study led by the University of Michigan (reports no salary support). Dr Kirklin has received partial support as principle investigator of the INTERMACS National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–sponsored registry for U.S. mechanical circulatory support (funding paid through institution). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Comment in

References

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources