Assessing Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Lessons Learned From Over 7,500 Transplants
- PMID: 37676215
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.07.005
Assessing Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Lessons Learned From Over 7,500 Transplants
Abstract
Background: To date, no studies have identified an optimal metric to match donor-recipient (D-R) pairs in pediatric heart transplantation (HT).
Objectives: This study sought to identify size mismatch metrics that predicted graft survival post-HT.
Methods: D-R pairs undergoing HT in Pediatric Heart Transplant Society database from 1993 to 2021 were included. Effects of size mismatch by height, weight, body mass index, body surface area, predicted heart mass, and total cardiac volume (TCV) on 1- and 5-year graft survival and morbidity outcomes (rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy) were evaluated. Cox models with stepwise selection identified size metrics that independently predicted graft survival.
Results: Of 7,715 D-R pairs, 36.0% were well matched (D-R ratio: -20% to +20%) by weight, 39.0% by predicted heart mass, 50.0% by body surface area, 57.0% by body mass index, 71.0% by height, and 93.0% by TCV. Of all size metrics, only D-R mismatch by height and TCV predicted graft survival at 1 and 5 years. Effects of D-R size mismatch on graft survival were nonlinear. At both 1 and 5 years post-HT, D-R undersizing and oversizing by height led to increased graft loss, with graft loss observed more frequently with undersizing. Moderately undersized donors by height (D-R ratio: <-30%) frequently experienced rejection post-HT (P < 0.001). Assessing D-R size matching by TCV, minimal donor undersizing was protective, while oversizing up to 25% was not associated with increased graft loss.
Conclusions: In pediatric HT, D-R appear most optimally matched using TCV. Only D-R size mismatch by TCV and height independently predicts graft survival. Standardizing size matching across centers may reduce donor discard.
Keywords: heart transplant; pediatric; size mismatch.
Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Amdani is a site principal investigator for a multicenter study led by the University of Michigan (reports no salary support). Dr Kirklin has received partial support as principle investigator of the INTERMACS National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–sponsored registry for U.S. mechanical circulatory support (funding paid through institution). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Comment in
-
Donor-Recipient Size Matching in Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Is it Time to Look Beyond Weight?JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Feb;12(2):392-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Oct 4. JACC Heart Fail. 2024. PMID: 37804310 No abstract available.
-
Is Total Cardiac Volume Optimal for Pediatric Cardiac Transplant Donor-Recipient Matching?JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Feb;12(2):424. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.11.019. JACC Heart Fail. 2024. PMID: 38326007 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical