Flower orientation and corolla length as reproductive barriers in the pollinator-driven divergence of Erica shannonea and Erica ampullacea
- PMID: 37676744
- DOI: 10.1111/plb.13575
Flower orientation and corolla length as reproductive barriers in the pollinator-driven divergence of Erica shannonea and Erica ampullacea
Abstract
A variety of reproductive barriers can enable reproductive isolation and stable coexistence of plant species. Differing floral traits might play an important role in reproductive isolation imposed by pollinators. Such shifts in pollinator use have been hypothesized to contribute to the radiation of Erica (Ericaceae) in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. The sister species Erica shannonea and Erica ampullacea co-occur and overlap in flowering phenology. Both have unscented long-tubed flowers consistent with adaptations for pollination by long-proboscid flies (LPFs), but differences in flower orientation and corolla tube length are indicative of a shift in pollinator species. We conducted controlled pollination experiments and pollinator observations to determine the breeding system and pollinators of the two species. Both species are self-incompatible and require pollinator visits for seed production, suggesting that pollinators could strongly influence flower evolution. The horizontally orientated flowers of E. shannonea were found to be pollinated by Philoliche rostrata (Tabanidae), which has a long, fixed forward-pointing proboscis, while the vertically upright orientated flowers of E. ampullacea were found to be pollinated by Prosoeca westermanni (Nemestrinidae), which has a shorter proboscis that can swivel downwards. The nemestrinid fly's proboscis is too short to access the nectar in the relative long-tubed flowers of E. shannonea and the tabanid fly's proboscis cannot swivel down to access the upright flowers of E. ampullacea. Consequently, these traits are likely to act as reproductive barriers between the two Erica species and thereby might have contributed to speciation and enable stable coexistence.
Keywords: Cape floristic region; long-proboscid fly; pollination; speciation.
© 2023 The Authors. Plant Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of German Society for Plant Sciences, Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.
References
-
- Aizen M.A., Harder L.D. (2007) Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology, 88, 271-281.
-
- Anderson B., Cole W.W., Barrett S.C.H. (2005) Specialized bird perch aids cross-pollination. Nature, 435, 41-42.
-
- Anderson B., Johnson S.D. (2009) Geographical covariation and local convergence of flower depth in a guild of fly-pollinated plants. New Phytologist, 182, 533-540.
-
- Anderson B., Ros P., Wiese T.J., Ellis A.G. (2014) Intraspecific divergence and convergence of floral tube length in specialized pollination interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281, 20141420.
-
- Ashman T.L., Morgan M.T. (2004) Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 553-559.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources