Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 17;50(2):201-214.
doi: 10.1188/23.ONF.201-214.

Distinct Dysphagia Profiles in Patients With Oral Cancer After Surgery

Affiliations

Distinct Dysphagia Profiles in Patients With Oral Cancer After Surgery

Asha Mathew et al. Oncol Nurs Forum. .

Abstract

Objectives: To determine distinct profiles based on symptom severity in patients undergoing surgery for oral cancer and examine whether these profiles differ by participant characteristics.

Sample & setting: 300 patients who underwent surgery for oral cancer at two outpatient clinics between June and December 2021.

Methods & variables: Symptoms were assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Cancer Module. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Latent profile analysis was performed.

Results: Five distinct dysphagia profiles were identified, which qualitatively differed regarding co-occurrence patterns of dysphagia, mucus-related symptoms, speech disturbances, and psychoneurologic symptoms. Significant differences were reported in interference to function, number of co-occurring symptoms, time since diagnosis and treatment completion, use of symptom management medications, oral cancer stage and site, and treatment completed.

Implications for nursing: Identifying distinct dysphagia profiles can improve patient outcomes and help in planning specific nursing interventions to influence nutritional and functional status in oral cancer survivors. Dysphagia and dry mouth can persist beyond one year post-treatment, so follow-up dysphagia assessments are needed.

Keywords: dysphagia; head and neck cancer; latent profile analysis; oral cancer; symptom cluster.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.. Symptom Mean Scores by Profile (N = 300)
profile 1—all mild; profile 2—dry dysphagic; profile 3—psychoneurologic dry dysphagic; profile 4—moist dysphagic; profile 5—psychoneurologic moist dysphagic Note. Mean symptom scores ranged from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

References

    1. Akaike H (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. 10.1007/BF02294359 - DOI
    1. Au TM, Dickstein BD, Comer JS, Salters-Pedneault K, & Litz BT (2013). Co-occurring posttraumatic stress and depression symptoms after sexual assault: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 149(1–3), 209–216. 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barsevick A (2016). Defining the symptom cluster: How far have we come? Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 32(4), 334–350. 10.1016/j.soncn.2016.08.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Broderick D, Lowe D, Kanatas A, & Rogers SN (2020). How much of a problem is too much saliva for patients following head and neck cancer. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 58(9), e51–e56. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.05.033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Chou C, Harle MT, Morrissey M, & Engstrom MC (2000). Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer, 89(7), 1634–1646. 10.1002/1097-0142(20001001)89:7<1634::aid-cncr29>3.0.co;2-v - DOI - PubMed

Publication types