Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;33(11):2294-2305.
doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.07.025. Epub 2023 Jul 22.

Treatment intensification following glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment in type 2 diabetes: The RESTORE-G real-world study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

Treatment intensification following glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment in type 2 diabetes: The RESTORE-G real-world study

Riccardo Candido et al. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Background and aims: To assess intensification approaches with basal insulin (BI) following glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods and results: Real-world data were collected in electronic medical records by 32 Italian diabetes clinics between 2011 and 2021. Primary endpoint was the proportion of insulin-naïve T2D patients treated with GLP-1 RA who initiated (add-on or switch) BI. Secondary endpoints were: treatment approaches, mean time to BI start, effectiveness and safety. Among 7,962 eligible patients, BI was prescribed to 3,164 (39.7%; 95%CI 38.7; 40.8): 67.6% switched to BI (22.1% also starting 1-3 injections of short-acting insulin), 22.7% added BI while maintaining GLP-1 RA, and 9.7% switched to a fixed-ratio combination of GLP-1 RA and BI (FRC). Median time since the first GLP-1 RA to BI/FRC prescription was 27.4 (IQ range 11.8-53.5) months. In this study 60.3% of patients did not start BI/FRC, among whom 15.2% intensified GLP-1 RA therapy with other oral agents. Effectiveness and safety were documented in all intensification approaches with BI/FRC, but HbA1c level at intensification time of ≥9.0% and suboptimal BI titration suggested clinical inertia. Use of second generation BI and add-on to GLP-1 RA schemes increased over time and effectiveness improved.

Conclusion: Clinical inertia should be overcome using innovative insulin options. Timely combination therapy of BI and GLP-1 RA is a valuable choice.

Keywords: Basal insulin; Effectiveness; Fixed-ratio combination; GLP-1 receptor agonists; Insulin naïve; Safety; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest Riccardo Candido has received consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Astra-Zeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche Diabetes Care; speaking fees from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Mundipharma Pharmaceutical, Abbott, MSD, Neopharmed Gentili, Menarini, Essex Italia, Ascensia Diabetes. Antonio Nicolucci and Maria Chiara Rossi have received funding for research from Sanofi, NovoNordisk, Alfasigma, Artsana, AstraZeneca, Johnson&Johnson, Medtronic, Shionogi, SOBI, Meteda and Theras. Monica Larosa is an employee of Sanofi and may hold shares and/or stock options in the company. Raffaele Napoli has served on advisory board panels, received consultancy and speaker's fees or financial support for research from AstraZeneca, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, MSD, Sanofi.

LinkOut - more resources