Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 7;9(1):155.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01386-z.

Evaluating the feasibility and exploring the efficacy of an emotion-based approach-avoidance modification training (eAAMT) in the context of perceived stress in an adult sample - protocol of a parallel randomized controlled pilot study

Affiliations

Evaluating the feasibility and exploring the efficacy of an emotion-based approach-avoidance modification training (eAAMT) in the context of perceived stress in an adult sample - protocol of a parallel randomized controlled pilot study

Marie Keinert et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: Stress levels and thus the risk of developing related physical and mental health conditions are rising worldwide. Dysfunctional beliefs contribute to the development of stress. Potentially, such beliefs can be modified with approach-avoidance modification trainings (AAMT). As previous research indicates that effects of AAMTs are small, there is a need for innovative ways of increasing the efficacy of these interventions. For this purpose, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of the intervention and study design and explore the efficacy of an innovative emotion-based AAMT version (eAAMT) that uses the display of emotions to move stress-inducing beliefs away from and draw stress-reducing beliefs towards oneself.

Methods: We will conduct a parallel randomized controlled pilot study at the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany. Individuals with elevated stress levels will be randomized to one of eight study conditions (n = 10 per condition) - one of six variants of the eAAMT, an active control intervention (swipe-based AAMT), or an inactive control condition. Participants in the intervention groups will engage in four sessions of 20-30 min (e)AAMT training on consecutive days. Participants in the inactive control condition will complete the assessments via an online tool. Non-blinded assessments will be taken directly before and after the training and 1 week after training completion. The primary outcome will be perceived stress. Secondary outcomes will be dysfunctional beliefs, symptoms of depression, emotion regulation skills, and physiological stress measures. We will compute effect sizes and conduct mixed ANOVAs to explore differences in change in outcomes between the eAAMT and control conditions.

Discussion: The study will provide valuable information to improve the intervention and study design. Moreover, if shown to be effective, the approach can be used as an automated smartphone-based intervention. Future research needs to identify target groups benefitting from this intervention utilized either as stand-alone treatment or an add-on intervention that is combined with other evidence-based treatments.

Trial registration: The trial has been registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien; DRKS00023007 ; September 7, 2020).

Keywords: Approach-avoidance modification; Dysfunctional beliefs; Emotion; Parallel randomized controlled pilot trial; Perceived stress; Smartphone-based intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study procedure. Note: PSS-10, Perceived Stress Scale 10; E, emotion; d, day; w, week. aAll unpleasant emotions (i.e., disgust, anxiety, sadness, and anger) are used to avoid dysfunctional beliefs. The approach-avoidance response ratio is 1:1. bAll unpleasant emotions are used to avoid dysfunctional beliefs, but the approach-avoidance response ratio is 4:1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Exemplary trial flow

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fink G. Stress: concepts, definition and history. In: Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. Elsevier. 2017. p. 1–9. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21972-X.
    1. UK Health and Safety Executive. Work-related stress, anxiety or depression statistics in Great Britain, 2020. https://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/stress.pdf Accessed 16 Nov 2021.
    1. O’Connor DB, Thayer JF, Vedhara K. Stress and health: a review of psychobiological processes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021;72:663–688. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-062520-122331. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen S, Janicki-Deverts D, Miller GE. Psychological stress and disease. JAMA. 2007;298(14):1685–1687. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.14.1685. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hammen C. Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:293–319. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938. - DOI - PubMed