Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
- PMID: 37680840
- PMCID: PMC10480765
- DOI: 10.12669/pjms.39.5.7072
Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
Abstract
Objective: To determine Maternal and Fetal outcome in women undergoing induction of labour with low dose misoprostol.
Method: A cross-sectional study was carried out to determine the efficacy of Misoprostol for induction of labor (IOL) in MTI, Lady Reading Hospital (LRH), Peshawar from 21st January to 31st December 2021. All pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation admitted for Induction of Labor were included in the study. Maternal and Fetal outcome was noted. Induction of labor was started with 25 micrograms of Misoprostol, repeated every six hours depending on Bishop Score.
Results: Three hundred and thirty-seven women were included in this study. The majority of females (76%) were in 18-35 years age group. In 92.3% of females, the Bishop score was less than six. The maximum number of females (33.5%) delivered after eight hours of IOL. Sixty-six (66.46%) of females had gestational age of 37-40 weeks. Premature rupture of membranes was the most common indication (32.9%). Three doses of misoprostol were required in 31.2% of females. Only 5.6% of females required six doses of misoprostol for induction. With Misoprostol 85.1% of females delivered spontaneously, 2.37% required forceps delivery, 1.7% required vacuum delivery, and 10.68% delivered by Caesarean Section. APGAR score was 8 /10 in 84% of neonates at birth. Eighty-seven %(87.8%) of neonates did not require NICU admission.
Conclusion: Misoprostol is a safe medicine to be used to induce labor in females. It can help shorten the duration of labor, with good fetomaternal outcome.
Keywords: Apgar score; Bishop Score; Eclampsia; Induction of Labor (IOL); Misoprostol.
Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None.
Similar articles
-
Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jul;179(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70256-x. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. PMID: 9704771 Clinical Trial.
-
EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.East Afr Med J. 2014 Sep;91(9):303-10. East Afr Med J. 2014. PMID: 26866082 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Versus Oral Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor: A Randomized Open-Label Study.Cureus. 2023 Nov 26;15(11):e49422. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49422. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38149157 Free PMC article.
-
Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):614.e1-614.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Mar 31. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29614276 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.J Formos Med Assoc. 1997 May;96(5):366-9. J Formos Med Assoc. 1997. PMID: 9170825 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Tsakiridis I, Mamopoulos A, Athanasiadis A, Dagklis T. Induction of labor:an overview of guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2020;75:61–72. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000752. - PubMed
-
- WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. Induction of Labour data. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organ; 2010.
-
- Induction of Labour. SOGC. Clinical practice Guidelines No 296. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(9):840–857. doi: 1701-2163(15)30842-2. - PubMed
-
- Ornat L, Alonso-Ventura V, Bueno-Notivol J, Chedraui P, Pérez-López FR. Health Outcomes and Systematic Analyses (HOUSSAY) Research Group. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies:a meta-Analysis of randomized trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(20):3453–3468. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1574741. - PubMed
-
- Kemper JI, Goni S, Flanagan M, Weeks A, Alfirevic Z, Bracken H, et al. Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor:Individual participant data meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(2):215–223. doi 10.1002/uog.23563. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources