Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0291448.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291448. eCollection 2023.

Building a strong foundation: How pre-doctorate experience shapes doctoral student outcomes

Affiliations

Building a strong foundation: How pre-doctorate experience shapes doctoral student outcomes

Svetlana Zhuchkova et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The effectiveness of doctoral programs has been a major topic of interest for national policies, universities, and researchers for decades now. However, studies that try to identify factors associated with doctoral students' success usually focus on characteristics measured during doctoral training, while the role of pre-doctorate characteristics remains underexplored. This research aims to fill this gap by examining whether and how various aspects of pre-doctorate experience-academic achievements, research experience related and unrelated to the dissertation topic, and teaching experience-contribute to the successful defense of the doctoral dissertation. Using data from a survey of the Russian doctoral programs' graduates (N = 985) and regression analysis, we show that research experience related to the dissertation topic is the only pre-doctorate characteristic associated with the successful defense of the dissertation. At the same time, the effect of this type of research experience vanishes when controlling for support from the supervisor and department that students receive during their training. The results of the study can be used for designing criteria for doctoral students' admission campaigns and introduction of integrated, or fast-track, doctoral programs, as well as to broaden our understanding of the relative importance of environmental vs. individual factors of doctoral students' outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Prevalence of different forms of pre-doctorate experience.
Question: “Could you please remember which of the following activities you did before you were enrolled in your doctoral program?” (N = 985).

References

    1. Castelló M, Pardo M, Sala-Bubaré A, Suñe-Soler N. Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. High Educ. 2017; 74:1053–1068. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9 - DOI
    1. Skopek J, Triventi M, Blossfeld H-P. How do institutional factors shape PhD completion rates? An analysis of long-term changes in a European doctoral program. Stud High Educ. 2022; 47:318–337. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1744125 - DOI
    1. de Valero YF. Departmental Factors Affecting Time-to-Degree and Completion Rates of Doctoral Students at One Land-Grant Research Institution. The Journal of Higher Education. 2001; 72:341–367. doi: 10.2307/2649335 - DOI
    1. Zhuchkova S, Terentev E, Saniyazova A, Bekova S. Departmental academic support for doctoral students in Russia: Categorisation and effects. Higher Education Quarterly. 2023; 77:215–231. doi: 10.1111/hequ.12389 - DOI
    1. Pyhältö K, Keskinen J. Doctoral Students’ Sense of Relational Agency in Their Scholarly Communities. IJHE. 2012; 1:136–149. doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p136 - DOI

Publication types