Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 1;99(1):98-105.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005450. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

Patient Engagement in Medical Trainee Selection: A Scoping Review

Patient Engagement in Medical Trainee Selection: A Scoping Review

Mark D Hanson et al. Acad Med. .

Abstract

Purpose: The stakes of medical trainee selection are high, making it ironic and somewhat paradoxical that patients and the public often get little say in selection practices. The authors sought to undertake a knowledge synthesis to uncover what is known about patient engagement across the medical trainee selection continuum.

Method: The authors conducted a scoping review aimed at exploring the current state of practice and research on patient engagement in medical trainee selection in 2017-2021. MeSH headings and keywords were used to capture patient, community, and standardized patient engagement in selection processes across multiple health professions. The authors employed broad inclusion criteria and iteratively refined the corpus, ultimately, limiting study selection to those reporting engagement of actual patients in selection within medicine, but maintaining a broad focus on any patient contributions across the entire selection continuum. The Cambridge Framework was adapted and used to organize the included studies.

Results: In total, 2,858 abstracts were reviewed, and ultimately, 28 papers were included in the final corpus. The included studies were global but nascent. Most of the literature on this topic appears in the form of individual projects advocating for patient engagement in selection rather than cohesive programs with empirical exploration of patient engagement in selection. Job analysis methodology was particularly prominent for incorporating the patient voice into identifying competencies of relevance to selection. Direct patient engagement in early selection activities allowed the patient voice to assist candidates in determining their fit for medicine.

Conclusions: Patient engagement has not been made a specific focus of study in its own right, leading the authors to encourage researchers to turn their lens more directly on patient engagement to explore how it complements the professional voice in medical trainee selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Patterson F, Knight A, Dowell J, et al. How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review. Med Educ. 2016;50(1):36–60.
    1. Prideaux D, Roberts C, Eva K, et al. Assessment for selection for the health care professions and specialty training: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(3):215–223.
    1. Koenig TW, Parrish SK, Terregino CA, et al. Core personal competencies important to entering students’ success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process? Acad Med. 2013;88(5):603–613.
    1. Patterson F, Roberts C, Hanson MD, et al. 2018 Ottawa consensus statement: selection and recruitment to the healthcare professions. Med Teach. 2018;40(11):1091–1101.
    1. Mueller PS. AM last page: Sir William Osler’s major contributions to medical education. Acad Med. 2010;85(7):1260.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources