Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 8;21(1):609.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04379-x.

Methods of ex vivo analysis of tissue status in vascularized composite allografts

Affiliations
Review

Methods of ex vivo analysis of tissue status in vascularized composite allografts

Carolyn Ton et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Vascularized composite allotransplantation can improve quality of life and restore functionality. However, the complex tissue composition of vascularized composite allografts (VCAs) presents unique clinical challenges that increase the likelihood of transplant rejection. Under prolonged static cold storage, highly damage-susceptible tissues such as muscle and nerve undergo irreversible degradation that may render allografts non-functional. Skin-containing VCA elicits an immunogenic response that increases the risk of recipient allograft rejection. The development of quantitative metrics to evaluate VCAs prior to and following transplantation are key to mitigating allograft rejection. Correspondingly, a broad range of bioanalytical methods have emerged to assess the progression of VCA rejection and characterize transplantation outcomes. To consolidate the current range of relevant technologies and expand on potential for development, methods to evaluate ex vivo VCA status are herein reviewed and comparatively assessed. The use of implantable physiological status monitoring biochips, non-invasive bioimpedance monitoring to assess edema, and deep learning algorithms to fuse disparate inputs to stratify VCAs are identified.

Keywords: Bioanalytical methods; Biomarkers; Transplantation; VCA; Vascularized composite tissue allografts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Prof. Guiseppi-Elie is founder, president, and scientific director of ABTECH Scientific, Inc., manufacturer of microfabricated electrodes and devices used in biomedical diagnostics and the measurement of physiological data. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the findings.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Perfusion bioreactor design and implementation. The general layout of the machine extracorporeal perfusion system commonly used in VCA ex-vivo perfusion. A A schematic illustration of the perfusate circulation as a system comprising a the porcine forelimb in the perfusion box on top of a b metal grid that allows c passive venous drainage of the preservation fluid, d a 15 mm needle probe that measures muscle temperature, e collection reservoir, f a centrifugal pump, regulating in-line pressure at ≤ 30 mmHg, g a membrane oxygenator, infusing the fluid with a mix of 95% O2 and 5% CO2, h heater-cooler machine, cooling the fluid to 8–10 °C, i drug administration point/fluid sampling port, and j flowmeter. (Image reproduced with permission from [54] ©2020 Anne Sophie Kruit et al. Transplant International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Steunstichting ESOT.) B An actual perfusion system showing a human arm in the bioreactor chamber. C and D Photos of actual perfusion bioreactor systems consisting of an allograft housing, perfusate pump, perfusate oxygenator, heater, sampling port, and flow meter. (Images reproduced with permission from [47] © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
An illustrative summary of methods of analysis of tissue status during preservation of allografts in VCA. Clockwise: Metabolic, Biochemical, Histopathological, and Biophysical. (Images reproduced with permission from [60, 61] © 2015 Royal College of Ophthalmologists, 2019 American Chemical Society, respectively.)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Edema is the main Indicator of acute rejection in VCA. A Representative images of edema manifestation in face allograft acute rejection i. No rejection (POM21), ii. early rejection (POM 8) and iii. late rejection (POM26). (Images reproduced with permission from [2] © 2019 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.) B Edema manifestation in hand allograft acute rejection (Images reproduced with permission from [107] © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.) C Skin allograft acute rejection graded based on Banff Scoring System. Normal skin: unaffected skin, GradeI: mild perivascular infiltration, GradeII: mild perivascular infiltration with/without mild epidermal or adnexal involvement. No epidermal dyskeratosis or apoptosis, Grade III: dense inflammation and epidermal involvement with apoptosis, dyskeratosis, and/or keratinolysis, Grade IV: necrotizing acute rejection. necrosis of skin structures. (Images reproduced with permission from [108] © 2013 Ravi Starzl et al.) D Association of clinical signs or subtherapeutic tacrolimus levels with acute rejection episodes. (Image reproduced with permission from [2] © 2019 Mary Ann Liebert)

References

    1. Kollar B, Pomahac B, Riella LV. Novel immunological and clinical insights in vascularized composite allotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2019;24(1):42–48. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000592. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haug V, Kollar B, Obed D, et al. The evolving clinical presentation of acute rejection in facial transplantation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2019;21(4):278–285. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0076. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shores JT, Malek V, Lee WPA, Brandacher G. Outcomes after hand and upper extremity transplantation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2017;28(5):72. doi: 10.1007/s10856-017-5880-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diaz-Siso JR, Parker M, Bueno EM, et al. Facial allotransplantation: a 3-year follow-up report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS. 2013;66(11):1458–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramly EP, Kantar RS, Diaz-Siso JR, Alfonso AR, Shetye PR, Rodriguez ED. Outcomes after tooth-bearing maxillomandibular facial transplantation: insights and lessons learned. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(10):2085–2103. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.05.011. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources