Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 24;13(17):2747.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172747.

Faster Elbow MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction-Assessment of Image Quality, Diagnostic Confidence, and Anatomy Visualization Compared to Standard Imaging

Affiliations

Faster Elbow MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction-Assessment of Image Quality, Diagnostic Confidence, and Anatomy Visualization Compared to Standard Imaging

Judith Herrmann et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences of the elbow regarding image quality and visualization of anatomy.

Materials and methods: Between October 2020 and June 2021, seventeen participants (eight patients, nine healthy subjects; mean age: 43 ± 16 (20-70) years, eight men) were prospectively included in this study. Each patient underwent two examinations: standard MRI, including TSE sequences reconstructed with a generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition reconstruction (TSESTD), and prospectively undersampled TSE sequences reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Two radiologists evaluated the images concerning image quality, noise, edge sharpness, artifacts, diagnostic confidence, and delineation of anatomical structures using a 5-point Likert scale, and rated the images concerning the detection of common pathologies.

Results: Image quality was significantly improved in TSEDL (mean 4.35, IQR 4-5) compared to TSESTD (mean 3.76, IQR 3-4, p = 0.008). Moreover, TSEDL showed decreased noise (mean 4.29, IQR 3.5-5) compared to TSESTD (mean 3.35, IQR 3-4, p = 0.004). Ratings for delineation of anatomical structures, artifacts, edge sharpness, and diagnostic confidence did not differ significantly between TSEDL and TSESTD (p > 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.628-0.904). No difference was found concerning the detection of pathologies between the readers and between TSEDL and TSESTD. Using DL, the acquisition time could be reduced by more than 35% compared to TSESTD.

Conclusion: TSEDL provided improved image quality and decreased noise while receiving equal ratings for edge sharpness, artifacts, delineation of anatomical structures, diagnostic confidence, and detection of pathologies compared to TSESTD. Providing more than a 35% reduction of acquisition time, TSEDL may be clinically relevant for elbow imaging due to increased patient comfort and higher patient throughput.

Keywords: MRI; acceleration; deep learning reconstruction; elbow; image processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Non-contrast elbow MRI acquired at 1.5 T in a 51-year-old female patient with the institution’s standard turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences (TSESTD, upper row) and deep learning-reconstructed TSE sequences (TSEDL, lower row). Increased edge sharpness in the TSEDL images is primarily seen in the coronal and sagittal T1-weighted sequences (T1 cor and T1 sag). In the fat-saturated coronal and axial PD-weighted images (PD cor and PD ax) the DL reconstruction shows decreased noise.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Non-contrast elbow MRI acquired at 3 T in a 70-year-old male patient with the institution’s standard turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences (TSESTD, upper row) and deep learning-reconstructed TSE sequences (TSEDL, lower row). In this example the standard and DL-reconstructed images show very similar image quality. In the TSEDL images, all anatomic details are well depicted, showing that the reduced acquisition time did not lead to a loss in detail. Additionally, edge sharpness in the coronal T1-weighted images (T1 cor) is slightly increased in the TSEDL image.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Elbow MRI acquired at 1.5 T in a 36-year-old male patient with clinically suspected biceps tendon tear after trauma with the institution’s standard turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences (TSESTD, upper row) and deep learning-reconstructed TSE sequences (TSEDL, lower row). The MRI examination confirmed the suspicion of a partial tear of the biceps’ tendon at its insertion with a peritendinous hematoma. Noise is reduced in the DL-reconstructed axial and sagittal fat-suppressed PD-weighted images (PD ax and PD sag). The intact ulnar collateral ligament is depicted well in the standard and DL-reconstructed coronal T1-weighted images; the difference in angulation between the two images is due to movement between acquisitions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Elbow MRI acquired at 1.5 T with the institution’s standard turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences (TSESTD, upper row) and deep learning reconstructed TSE sequences (TSEDL, lower row) in a 66-year-old female patient who had suffered an elbow dislocation. The patient could not extend the elbow for the examination. The images show an avulsion of the common flexor tendon with hemorrhage into the flexor muscles (PD cor and PD cor), a complete tear of the radial collateral ligament (PD cor, third column) and a dislocated annular ligament (PD sag). The fat-supressed PD-weighted TSEDL images show improved noise, while the DL-reconstructed coronal T1-weighted image shows very similar image quality compared to the standard image.

References

    1. Reville R.T., Neuhauser F.W., Bhattacharya J., Martin C. Comparing severity of impairment for different permanent upper extremity musculoskeletal injuries. J. Occup. Rehabil. 2002;12:205–221. doi: 10.1023/A:1016898729338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simmen B.R., Angst F., Schwyzer H.K., Herren D.B., Pap G., Aeschlimann A., Goldhahn J. A concept for comprehensively measuring health, function and quality of life following orthopaedic interventions of the upper extremity. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2009;129:113–118. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0718-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Protokollempfehlungen der AG Bildgebende Verfahren des Bewegungsapparates (AG BVB) der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft (DRG) zu Messsequenzen für die Gelenk-MRT. Rofo. 2018;190:186–190. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-125412. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heye T., Knoerl R., Wehrle T., Mangold D., Cerminara A., Loser M., Plumeyer M., Degen M., Luthy R., Brodbeck D., et al. The Energy Consumption of Radiology: Energy- and Cost-saving Opportunities for CT and MRI Operation. Radiology. 2020;295:593–605. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192084. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gassenmaier S., Kustner T., Nickel D., Herrmann J., Hoffmann R., Almansour H., Afat S., Nikolaou K., Othman A.E. Deep Learning Applications in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Has the Future Become Present? Diagnostics. 2021;11:2181. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122181. - DOI - PMC - PubMed