Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2023 Dec;109(6):570-575.
doi: 10.1177/03008916231196801. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

Impact of inter-observer variability on first axillary level dosimetry in breast cancer radiotherapy: An AIRO multi-institutional study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Impact of inter-observer variability on first axillary level dosimetry in breast cancer radiotherapy: An AIRO multi-institutional study

Maria Cristina Leonardi et al. Tumori. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

This study quantified the incidental dose to the first axillary level (L1) in locoregional treatment plan for breast cancer. Eighteen radiotherapy centres contoured L1-L4 on three different patients (P1,2,3), created the L2-L4 planning target volume (single centre planning target volume, SC-PTV) and elaborated a locoregional treatment plan. The L2-L4 gold standard clinical target volume (CTV) along with the gold standard L1 contour (GS-L1) were created by an expert consensus. The SC-PTV was then replaced by the GS-PTV and the incidental dose to GS-L1 was measured. Dosimetric data were analysed with Kruskal-Wallis test. Plans were intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based. P3 with 90° arm setup had statistically significant higher L1 dose across the board than P1 and P2, with the mean dose (Dmean) reaching clinical significance. Dmean of P1 and P2 was consistent with the literature (77.4% and 74.7%, respectively). The incidental dose depended mostly on L1 proportion included in the breast fields, underlining the importance of the setup, even in case of IMRT.

Keywords: breast cancer; contouring; first axillary level; inter-observer variability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Division of Radiotherapy IEO received research funding from AIRC (Italian Association for Cancer Research) and Fondazione IEO-CCM (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia-Centro Cardiologico Monzino) (all outside the current project). BAJF received speakers fee from Roche, Bayer, Janssen, Carl Zeiss, Ipsen, Accuray, Astellas, Elekta, IBA Astra Zeneca (all outside the current project). MCL received a speaker fee from Accuray Inc (outside the current project). SD received speakers fee from Accuray Asia (outside the current project). MGV was supported by a research fellowship from AIRC entitled “Radioablation ± hormonotherapy for prostate cancer oligorecurrences (RADIOSA trial): potential of imaging and biology”, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03940235, approved by the Ethics Committee of IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia and Centro Cardiologico Monzino (IEO-997). IEO, the European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Ricerca Corrente and 5x1000 funds and by institutional grants from Accuray Inc. The sponsors did not play any role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, nor in the writing of the manuscript, nor in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
First axillary level (L1) percentage dose in terms of near-min dose (D95, a), near-max dose (D2, b), V95% (c), and mean dose (Dmean, d) for the three case patients. List of abbreviations. D2 = Dose delivered to 2% of volume (Dnear-max); D95 = Dose delivered to 98% of volume (Dnear-min); P = Patient; SD = Standard Deviation.

References

    1. Schmitt M, Pin Y, Pflumio C, et al. Incidental axillary dose delivery to axillary lymph node levels I-III by different techniques of whole-breast irradiation: a systematic literature review. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197: 820-828. - PubMed
    1. Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2017; 318: 918-926. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tinterri C, Gentile D, Gatzemeier W, et al. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared with complete dissection in t1-2 breast cancer patients presenting one or two metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: The SINODAR-ONE multicenter randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29: 5732-5744. - PubMed
    1. Galimberti V, Cole BF, Viale G, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): 10-year follow-up of a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 1385-1393. - PubMed
    1. Ursini LA, Nuzzo M, Rosa C, et al. Whole breast radiotherapy in cN0 early breast cancer patients with pathological sentinel lymph nodes (pN1mic, pN1). without axillary dissection: preliminary results of the observational LISEN trial. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198: 612-621. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types