INTRAORAL SCANNING AND CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSION MAY HAVE SIMILAR TIME EFFICIENCY FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE CROWNS AND THREE-UNIT FIXED TOOTH-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES
- PMID: 37689444
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101894
INTRAORAL SCANNING AND CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSION MAY HAVE SIMILAR TIME EFFICIENCY FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE CROWNS AND THREE-UNIT FIXED TOOTH-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES
Abstract
Article title and bibliographic information: Bandiaky ON, Le Bars P, Gaudin A, Hardouin JB, Cheraud-Carpentier M, Mbodj EB, Soueidan A. Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Nov 2. PMID: 33,143,901.
Source of funding: Information not available TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of data.
Keywords: Conventional impression; Crown; Digital impression; Digital scan; Fixed partial denture; Tooth supported bridge.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment on
-
Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Nov 2. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. PMID: 33143901
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous