Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 9;9(1):75.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00580-9.

High-dose alkylating chemotherapy in BRCA-altered triple-negative breast cancer: the randomized phase III NeoTN trial

Affiliations

High-dose alkylating chemotherapy in BRCA-altered triple-negative breast cancer: the randomized phase III NeoTN trial

Sonja Vliek et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

Exploratory analyses of high-dose alkylating chemotherapy trials have suggested that BRCA1 or BRCA2-pathway altered (BRCA-altered) breast cancer might be particularly sensitive to this type of treatment. In this study, patients with BRCA-altered tumors who had received three initial courses of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC), were randomized between a fourth ddAC course followed by high-dose carboplatin-thiotepa-cyclophosphamide or conventional chemotherapy (initially ddAC only or ddAC-capecitabine/decetaxel [CD] depending on MRI response, after amendment ddAC-carboplatin/paclitaxel [CP] for everyone). The primary endpoint was the neoadjuvant response index (NRI). Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 122 patients were randomized. No difference in NRI-score distribution (p = 0.41) was found. A statistically non-significant RFS difference was found (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.23-1.25; p = 0.15). Exploratory RFS analyses showed benefit in stage III (n = 35; HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.03-0.75), but not stage II (n = 86; HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.30-3.30) patients. For stage III, 4-year RFS was 46% (95% CI 24-87%), 71% (95% CI 48-100%) and 88% (95% CI 74-100%), for ddAC/ddAC-CD, ddAC-CP and high-dose chemotherapy, respectively. No significant differences were found between high-dose and conventional chemotherapy in stage II-III, triple-negative, BRCA-altered breast cancer patients. Further research is needed to establish if there are patients with stage III, triple negative BRCA-altered breast cancer for whom outcomes can be improved with high-dose alkylating chemotherapy or whether the current standard neoadjuvant therapy including carboplatin and an immune checkpoint inhibitor is sufficient. Trial Registration: NCT01057069.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. S.C.L. does have a pending patent application for a BRCA-like ovarian cancer classifier.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. CONSORT diagram.
*Three ineligible patients were randomized by mistake: two patients with a tumor that showed a sporadic-like profile, but that at the same time was positive for BRCA1 promoter hyper-methylation were randomized to the conventional chemotherapy arm. One received ddAC-only, the other ddAC-CP. One patient was found to be metastatic at baseline and was randomized to the high-dose arm. These patients remained part of the ITT analysis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Locoregional response.
a Neoadjuvant Response Index (NRI) by chemotherapy arm, b pathological complete response (pCR) rate by disease stage, stratified by treatment arm.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Recurrence-free and overall survival.
a Recurrence-free survival (RFS) by treatment arm and b Overall survival by treatment arm for high-dose (HD) chemotherapy vs. conventional (Conv.) chemotherapy.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Forest plot recurrence-free survival.
Recurrence-free survival hazard ratios (HR) for high-dose (HD) chemotherapy vs. conventional (Conv.) chemotherapy for various patient subgroups.

References

    1. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berry DA, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: overview of 15 randomized trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011;29:3214–3223. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5910. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hryniuk W, Frei E, 3rd, Wright FA. A single scale for comparing dose-intensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer: summation dose-intensity. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998;16:3137–3147. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.9.3137. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farquhar, C., Marjoribanks, J., Lethaby, A. & Azhar, M. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD003139, 10.1002/14651858.CD003139.pub3 (2016). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vollebergh MA, et al. An aCGH classifier derived from BRCA1-mutated breast cancer and benefit of high-dose platinum-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative breast cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 2011;22:1561–1570. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq624. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data