Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 10;15(8):e43280.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43280. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Adjustable Male Sling for The Treatment of Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence: Intermediate-Term Follow-Up Results

Affiliations

Adjustable Male Sling for The Treatment of Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence: Intermediate-Term Follow-Up Results

Fatih Yanaral et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the outcomes of adjustable male sling (Argus®) implantation in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) with intermediate-term follow-up results. Materials and methods The data on adjustable male sling surgery between September 2015 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were preoperatively evaluated with a voiding diary, 24-hour pad test, and validated questionnaire. Functional outcomes were also evaluated using 24-hour pad requirement and pad weight, and the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ-SF) score. Results A total of 16 patients (eight having undergone the transurethral resection of the prostate [TUR-P] and eight radical prostatectomy [RP]) were enrolled in the study. Thirteen patients had moderate (81.25%) PPI, and three patients (18.75%) had severe PPI. With the mean follow-up of 36.9±14.3 months, nine patients (56.2%) were noted as cured and four (25%) as improved, with an overall success rate of 81.2%. At the last follow-up visit, the median number of pads used per day decreased from 3.5 to 1, and the 24-hour pad test result decreased from 300 to 50 gr (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The ICIQ-SF score decreased from the initial mean of 15.8 ± 2.3 to 7.1 ± 6.6 (p < 0.001). When the outcomes were compared according to the etiology, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.522). Conclusions Male sling surgery can be performed safely in patients with moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence with low complication and high success rates. The results of TUR-P-related PPI are similar to those of surgery performed due to the etiology of RP.

Keywords: adjustable male sling; male urinary incontinence; prostate; prostate surgery; stress urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The success rates per degree of incontinence

Similar articles

References

    1. Surgical treatment of male postprostatectomy incontinence: current concepts. Kretschmer A, Nitti V. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3:364–376. - PubMed
    1. Sling surgery for the treatment of urinary incontinence after transurethral resection of the prostate: new data on the virtue male sling and an evaluation of literature. Hogewoning CR, Meij LA, Pelger RC, Putter H, Krouwel EM, Elzevier HW. Urology. 2017;100:187–192. - PubMed
    1. The male sling for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review of contemporary sling designs and outcomes. Welk BK, Herschorn S. BJU Int. 2012;109:328–344. - PubMed
    1. Complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in patients with or without prior radiotherapy. Ravier E, Fassi-Fehri H, Crouzet S, Gelet A, Abid N, Martin X. BJU Int. 2015;115:300–307. - PubMed
    1. Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence--what do patients choose? Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, Nitti VW. J Urol. 2009;181:1231–1235. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources