Adjustable Male Sling for The Treatment of Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence: Intermediate-Term Follow-Up Results
- PMID: 37692721
- PMCID: PMC10492627
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43280
Adjustable Male Sling for The Treatment of Postprostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence: Intermediate-Term Follow-Up Results
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the outcomes of adjustable male sling (Argus®) implantation in the management of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) with intermediate-term follow-up results. Materials and methods The data on adjustable male sling surgery between September 2015 and September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were preoperatively evaluated with a voiding diary, 24-hour pad test, and validated questionnaire. Functional outcomes were also evaluated using 24-hour pad requirement and pad weight, and the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICIQ-SF) score. Results A total of 16 patients (eight having undergone the transurethral resection of the prostate [TUR-P] and eight radical prostatectomy [RP]) were enrolled in the study. Thirteen patients had moderate (81.25%) PPI, and three patients (18.75%) had severe PPI. With the mean follow-up of 36.9±14.3 months, nine patients (56.2%) were noted as cured and four (25%) as improved, with an overall success rate of 81.2%. At the last follow-up visit, the median number of pads used per day decreased from 3.5 to 1, and the 24-hour pad test result decreased from 300 to 50 gr (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The ICIQ-SF score decreased from the initial mean of 15.8 ± 2.3 to 7.1 ± 6.6 (p < 0.001). When the outcomes were compared according to the etiology, there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.522). Conclusions Male sling surgery can be performed safely in patients with moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence with low complication and high success rates. The results of TUR-P-related PPI are similar to those of surgery performed due to the etiology of RP.
Keywords: adjustable male sling; male urinary incontinence; prostate; prostate surgery; stress urinary incontinence.
Copyright © 2023, Yanaral et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Adjustable bulbourethral male sling: experience after 101 cases of moderate-to-severe male stress urinary incontinence.BJU Int. 2011 Mar;107(5):777-782. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09619.x. Epub 2010 Oct 21. BJU Int. 2011. PMID: 20964801
-
Retropubic vs transobturator Argus adjustable male sling: Results from a multicenter study.Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Mar;39(3):987-993. doi: 10.1002/nau.24316. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020. PMID: 32125722
-
An adjustable male sling for treating urinary incontinence after prostatectomy: a phase III multicentre trial.BJU Int. 2006 Mar;97(3):533-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06002.x. BJU Int. 2006. PMID: 16469021 Clinical Trial.
-
Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study.BJU Int. 2021 Feb;127(2):229-237. doi: 10.1111/bju.15197. Epub 2020 Aug 26. BJU Int. 2021. PMID: 32744793
-
Surgical Treatment of Male Postprostatectomy Incontinence: Current Concepts.Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Oct;3(4-5):364-376. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 23. Eur Urol Focus. 2017. PMID: 29174616 Review.
References
-
- Surgical treatment of male postprostatectomy incontinence: current concepts. Kretschmer A, Nitti V. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3:364–376. - PubMed
-
- Sling surgery for the treatment of urinary incontinence after transurethral resection of the prostate: new data on the virtue male sling and an evaluation of literature. Hogewoning CR, Meij LA, Pelger RC, Putter H, Krouwel EM, Elzevier HW. Urology. 2017;100:187–192. - PubMed
-
- The male sling for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a review of contemporary sling designs and outcomes. Welk BK, Herschorn S. BJU Int. 2012;109:328–344. - PubMed
-
- Complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in patients with or without prior radiotherapy. Ravier E, Fassi-Fehri H, Crouzet S, Gelet A, Abid N, Martin X. BJU Int. 2015;115:300–307. - PubMed
-
- Artificial urinary sphincter versus male sling for post-prostatectomy incontinence--what do patients choose? Kumar A, Litt ER, Ballert KN, Nitti VW. J Urol. 2009;181:1231–1235. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources