Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2023 Aug 31:2023.08.29.555417.
doi: 10.1101/2023.08.29.555417.

Saccharomycotina yeasts defy longstanding macroecological patterns

Kyle T David  1 , Marie-Claire Harrison  1 , Dana A Opulente  2   3 , Abigail L LaBella  1   4 , John F Wolters  2 , Xiaofan Zhou  5 , Xing-Xing Shen  6 , Marizeth Groenewald  7 , Matt Pennell  8 , Chris Todd Hittinger  2 , Antonis Rokas  1
Affiliations

Saccharomycotina yeasts defy longstanding macroecological patterns

Kyle T David et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

  • Saccharomycotina yeasts defy long-standing macroecological patterns.
    David KT, Harrison MC, Opulente DA, LaBella AL, Wolters JF, Zhou X, Shen XX, Groenewald M, Pennell M, Hittinger CT, Rokas A. David KT, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 5;121(10):e2316031121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2316031121. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 38412132 Free PMC article.

Abstract

The Saccharomycotina yeasts ("yeasts" hereafter) are a fungal clade of scientific, economic, and medical significance. Yeasts are highly ecologically diverse, found across a broad range of environments in every biome and continent on earth1; however, little is known about what rules govern the macroecology of yeast species and their range limits in the wild2. Here, we trained machine learning models on 12,221 occurrence records and 96 environmental variables to infer global distribution maps for 186 yeast species (~15% of described species from 75% of orders) and to test environmental drivers of yeast biogeography and macroecology. We found that predicted yeast diversity hotspots occur in mixed montane forests in temperate climates. Diversity in vegetation type and topography were some of the greatest predictors of yeast species richness, suggesting that microhabitats and environmental clines are key to yeast diversification. We further found that range limits in yeasts are significantly influenced by carbon niche breadth and range overlap with other yeast species, with carbon specialists and species in high diversity environments exhibiting reduced geographic ranges. Finally, yeasts contravene many longstanding macroecological principles, including the latitudinal diversity gradient, temperature-dependent species richness, and latitude-dependent range size (Rapoport's rule). These results unveil how the environment governs the global diversity and distribution of species in the yeast subphylum. These high-resolution models of yeast species distributions will facilitate the prediction of economically relevant and emerging pathogenic species under current and future climate scenarios.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest A.R. is a scientific consultant of LifeMine Therapeutics, Inc. The authors declare no other competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Global yeast diversity.
A) Heat map of the distributions of 186 yeast species inferred through random forest machine learning models. B) Average species richness per grid cell for each latitude band or line.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Yeast species richness is concentrated in temperate, mixed forests.
Average species richness per grid cell for each Koppen-Geiger climate class (A) and biome (B).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Traditional predictors of species diversity are poor indicators of yeast species diversity.
A) Variables that scale with diversity in other clades, such as tropical climates (left), temperature (center), and area (right), did not scale with yeast species diversity. B) Three select variables that were among the best predictors of yeast species diversity: temperate climates (left), vegetation diversity (center), and geomorphic class diversity (right). All graphs represent the same regression analysis with the following summary statistics; FDR: false discovery rate of the negative binomial regression. m: scaled slope of linear regression. r2: coefficient of determination for linear regression. Trend-lines were produced through locally weighted smoothing.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Yeast species range size scales negatively with species richness and latitude, positively with carbon niche breadth.
A) Specialist species that grew on only a few carbon sources had significantly smaller geographic ranges than non-specialists. p-values represent a phylogenetic ANOVA test. Size of inferred ranges for each species included in this study, compared to B) species richness, and C) absolute latitude. Summary statistics represented phylogenetic generalized least squares tests. All tests use the same underlying time-calibrated tree from Opulente, LaBella et al. 2023
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Péter G., Takashima M. & Čadež N. in Yeasts in Natural Ecosystems: Ecology (eds. Buzzini P., Lachance M.-A. & Yurkov A.) 39–71 (Springer International Publishing, 2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61575-2_2 - DOI
    1. Spurley W. J., Fisher K. J., Langdon Q. K., Buh K. V., Jarzyna M., Haase M. A., Sylvester K., Moriarty R. V., Rodriguez D. & Sheddan A. Substrate, temperature, and geographical patterns among nearly 2000 natural yeast isolates. Yeast 39, 55–68 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen X.-X., Opulente D. A., Kominek J., Zhou X., Steenwyk J. L., Buh K. V., Haase M. A. B., Wisecaver J. H., Wang M., Doering D. T., Boudouris J. T., Schneider R. M., Langdon Q. K., Ohkuma M., Endoh R., Takashima M., Manabe R., Čadež N., Libkind D., Rosa C. A., DeVirgilio J., Hulfachor A. B., Groenewald M., Kurtzman C. P., Hittinger C. T. & Rokas A. Tempo and Mode of Genome Evolution in the Budding Yeast Subphylum. Cell 175, 1533–1545.e20 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Opulente D. A., LaBella A. L., Harrison M.-C., Wolters J. F., Liu C., Li Y., Kominek J., Steenwyk J. L., Stoneman H. R. & VanDenAvond J. Genomic and ecological factors shaping specialism and generalism across an entire subphylum. bioRxiv 2023.06. 19.545611 (2023).
    1. Starmer W. T. & Lachance M.-A. Yeast ecology. The yeasts 65–83 (2011).

Publication types