Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 20:16:100235.
doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100235. eCollection 2023 Sep.

An assessment of childhood cancer care services in India - gaps, challenges and the way forward

Affiliations

An assessment of childhood cancer care services in India - gaps, challenges and the way forward

Anita Nath et al. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. .

Abstract

Background: Childhood cancers are emerging as an essential concern in India where there is lack of a specific programme component or policy to address childhood cancer control. There is limited information on the status and quality of childhood cancer care services in India. This paper describes the childhood cancer care services available at secondary and tertiary-level hospitals in India through a cross sectional study design.

Methods: The survey was conducted in 137 tertiary-level and 92 secondary-level hospitals in 26 states and 4 Union Territories (UTs), ensuring a uniform representation of public and private care hospitals. The study tool collected data on the organisational infrastructure, type of oncology services, health workforce, equipment, treatment and referral protocols, and treatment guidelines. Descriptive statistics was used to primarily present the health service status and data on childhood cancer care services in proportions and mean.

Findings: A dedicated pediatric oncology department was available in 41.6% of the public, 48.6% of private, and 64% Non Government Organization (NGO) managed tertiary-level hospitals. In 36 (39%) of the 92 hospitals providing secondary care, childhood cancer care was provided. The availability of bone (41.5%) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans (25.9%) was lower in public tertiary hospitals, whereas histopathology, computerised tomography (CT scan), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were lower in public secondary hospitals than private and NGO managed hospitals for the corresponding level of care. Most tertiary hospitals had the required supportive care facilities except for play therapy and hospice care. Less than 50% of the public tertiary hospitals had stocks of the four categories of cancer-treating drugs and essential infrastructure for radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Most secondary-level hospitals not treating childhood cancer had referral linkages with tertiary hospitals.

Interpretation: The situational analysis of childhood cancer care services in India showed the concentration of availability of childhood cancer care services at the tertiary level of health care. There were gaps in the availability of specialised pediatric oncology care in all the tertiary hospitals. The availability of childhood cancer care services was higher in private and NGO-managed hospitals than in public hospitals. Integration of childhood cancer as a part of the national cancer control response should be taken up as a matter of priority. The need of the hour is to formulate a childhood cancer policy that will enable timely access to care universally.

Funding: World Health Organization, India provided funding and technical support.

Keywords: Care; Childhood cancer; Health services; India.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Availability of childhood cancer treating drugs at tertiary hospitals (%).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cost of childhood cancer treating medicines available at tertiary hospitals (%).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a) Availability of drugs for treating childhood cancers at secondary level public hospitals (%). b) Availability of drugs for treating childhood cancers at secondary level private hospitals (%).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Availability of infrastructure relevant to managing childhood cancer services at the tertiary hospitals.

References

    1. GBD 2017 Childhood Cancer Collaborators The global burden of childhood and adolescent cancer in 2017: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1211–1225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhakta N., Force L.M., Allemani C., et al. Childhood cancer burden: a review of global estimates. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:e42–e53. - PubMed
    1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) University of Washington, IHME; Seattle: 2017. GBD compare.https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ Available on:
    1. Gatta G., Botta L., Rossi S., et al. Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:35–47. - PubMed
    1. Allemani C., Matsuda T., Di Carlo V., et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391:1023–1075. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources