Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;41(3):376-384.
doi: 10.1111/ger.12713. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

Orofacial dysfunction after stroke-A multidisciplinary approach

Affiliations

Orofacial dysfunction after stroke-A multidisciplinary approach

Pia Skott et al. Gerodontology. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: This paper describes the study protocol in an ongoing clinical trial evaluating oral screen training as part of a post-stroke rehabilitation programme. Baseline data were related to four domains: dysphagia, lip function, masticatory performance and patient-related outcome measures (PROM).

Background: Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability-adjusted life years, and dysphagia is a common remaining problem after stroke. Rehabilitation using oral screen training has been suggested to improve swallowing, but evidence is still insufficient.

Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with stroke with persisting objective and/or subjective swallowing dysfunction after primary rehabilitation were assessed for eligibility. In total, 25 patients were included. Objective function was assessed by swallowing capacity test (SCT), lip force and masticatory performance, subjective function by EAT-10 and NOT-S and PROM by LiSat-11 and ESAS.

Results: Baseline data presented a heterogeneous pattern with no significant association between objective and subjective dysfunction. Most of the participants (20/25) showed impaired swallowing capacity in SCT, and 23/24 revealed orofacial dysfunction according to NOT-S. The most common subjective item reported was chewing and swallowing problems (19/24).

Conclusion: The heterogenous findings in the included tests and the lack of correlations emphasise the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to identify objective and subjective orofacial post-stroke dysfunction in clinical practice to be able to offer evidence-based individualised care. The included participants were representative of stroke patients with dysphagia, which supports proceeding with the planned intervention.

Keywords: dysphagia; multidisciplinary approach; oral screen; orofacial training; rehabilitation; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaboration. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204‐1222. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
    1. Schimmel M , Ono T , Lam OL , Muller F . Oro‐facial impairment in stroke patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(4):313‐326. doi:10.1111/joor.12486
    1. Cohen DL , Roffe C , Beavan J , et al. Post‐stroke dysphagia: a review and design considerations for future trials. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(4):399‐411. doi:10.1177/1747493016639057
    1. Hinchey JA , Shephard T , Furie K , et al. Formal dysphagia screening protocols prevent pneumonia. Stroke. 2005;36(9):1972‐1976. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000177529.86868.8d
    1. Martino R , Foley N , Bhogal S , Diamant N , Speechley M , Teasell R . Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36(12):2756‐2763. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000190056.76543.eb

LinkOut - more resources