Hemodynamic failure and graft dysfunction after lung transplant: A possible clinical continuum with immediate and long-term consequences
- PMID: 37694497
- DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15122
Hemodynamic failure and graft dysfunction after lung transplant: A possible clinical continuum with immediate and long-term consequences
Abstract
Introduction: The postoperative hemodynamic management after lung transplant (LUTX) is guided by limited evidence. We aimed to describe and evaluate risk factors and outcomes of postoperative vasoactive support of LUTX recipients.
Methods: In a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive adult LUTX, two cohorts were identified: (1) patients needing prolonged vasoactive support (>12 h from ICU admission) (VASO+); (2) or not (VASO-). Postoperative hemodynamic characteristics were thoroughly analyzed. Risk factors and outcomes of VASO+ versus VASO- cohorts were assessed by multivariate logistic regression and propensity score matching.
Results: One hundred and thirty-eight patients were included (86 (62%) VASO+ versus 52 (38%) VASO-). Vasopressors (epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine) were used in the first postoperative days (vasoactive inotropic score at 12 h: 6 [4-12]), while inodilators (dobutamine, levosimendan) later. Length of vasoactive support was 3 [2-4] days. Independent predictors of vasoactive use were: LUTX indication different from cystic fibrosis (p = .003), higher Oto score (p = .020), longer cold ischemia time (p = .031), but not preoperative cardiac catheterization. VASO+ patients showed concomitant hemodynamic and graft impairment, with longer mechanical ventilation (p = .010), higher primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade at 72 h (PGD grade > 0 65% vs. 31%, p = .004, OR 4.2 [1.54-11.2]), longer ICU (p < .001) and hospital stay (p = .013). Levosimendan as a second-line inodilator appeared safe.
Conclusions: Vasoactive support is frequently necessary after LUTX, especially in recipients of grafts of lesser quality. Postoperative hemodynamic dysfunction requiring vasopressor support and graft dysfunction may represent a clinical continuum with immediate and long-term consequences. Further studies may elucidate if this represents a possible treatable condition.
Keywords: hemodynamics; lung transplant; primary graft dysfunction; vasoactive support.
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical Transplantation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Weill D, Benden C, Corris PA, et al. A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014-an update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015;34(1):1-15. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2014.06.014
-
- Kusunose K, Tsutsui RS, Bhatt K, et al. Prognostic value of RV function before and after lung transplantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(11):1084-1094. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.07.012
-
- Yusen RD, Christie JD, Edwards LB, et al. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirtieth adult lung and heart-lung transplant report-2013; focus theme: age. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(10):965-978. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.007
-
- Scaravilli V, Morlacchi LC, Merrino A, et al. Intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis patients: predictors and impact on outcome. J Cyst Fibros. 2020;19(4):659-665. doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2019.10.016
-
- Hoetzenecker K, Schwarz S, Muckenhuber M, et al. Intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the possibility of postoperative prolongation improve survival in bilateral lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(5):2193-2206. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.144
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous