Making waves: Comparative analysis of gene drive spread characteristics in a continuous space model
- PMID: 37694511
- DOI: 10.1111/mec.17131
Making waves: Comparative analysis of gene drive spread characteristics in a continuous space model
Abstract
With their ability to rapidly increase in frequency, gene drives can be used to modify or suppress target populations after an initial release of drive individuals. Recent advances have revealed many possibilities for different types of drives, and several of these have been realized in experiments. These drives have advantages and disadvantages related to their ease of construction, confinement and capacity to be used for modification or suppression. Though characteristics of these drives have been explored in modelling studies, assessment in continuous space environments has been limited, often focusing on outcomes rather than fundamental properties. Here, we conduct a comparative analysis of many different gene drive types that have the capacity to form a wave of advance in continuous space using individual-based simulations in continuous space. We evaluate the drive wave speed as a function of drive performance and ecological parameters, which reveals substantial differences between drive performance in panmictic versus spatial environments. In particular, we find that suppression drive waves are uniquely vulnerable to fitness costs and undesired CRISPR cleavage activity in embryos by maternal deposition. Some drives, however, retain robust performance even with widely varying efficiency parameters. To gain a better understanding of drive waves, we compare their panmictic performance and find that the rate of wild-type allele removal is correlated with drive wave speed, though this is also affected by other factors. Overall, our results provide a useful resource for understanding the performance of drives in spatially continuous environments, which may be most representative of potential drive deployment in many relevant scenarios.
Keywords: biotechnology; continuous space; gene drive; genetically modified organisms; population dynamics; wave of advance.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Performance analysis of novel toxin-antidote CRISPR gene drive systems.BMC Biol. 2020 Mar 12;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-0761-2. BMC Biol. 2020. PMID: 32164660 Free PMC article.
-
Simulations Reveal High Efficiency and Confinement of a Population Suppression CRISPR Toxin-Antidote Gene Drive.ACS Synth Biol. 2023 Mar 17;12(3):809-819. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00611. Epub 2023 Feb 24. ACS Synth Biol. 2023. PMID: 36825354
-
Deployment of tethered gene drive for confined suppression in continuous space requires avoiding drive wave interference.Mol Ecol. 2024 Oct;33(19):e17530. doi: 10.1111/mec.17530. Epub 2024 Sep 16. Mol Ecol. 2024. PMID: 39282691
-
Can CRISPR-Based Gene Drive Be Confined in the Wild? A Question for Molecular and Population Biology.ACS Chem Biol. 2018 Feb 16;13(2):424-430. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00923. Epub 2018 Feb 7. ACS Chem Biol. 2018. PMID: 29370514 Review.
-
Applications of gene drive systems for population suppression of insect pests.Bull Entomol Res. 2022 Dec;112(6):724-733. doi: 10.1017/S0007485322000268. Epub 2022 Aug 31. Bull Entomol Res. 2022. PMID: 36043456 Review.
Cited by
-
The Spatial Spread and the Persistence of Gene Drives Are Affected by Demographic Feedbacks, Density Dependence and Allee Effects.Mol Ecol. 2025 Aug;34(16):e70028. doi: 10.1111/mec.70028. Epub 2025 Jul 19. Mol Ecol. 2025. PMID: 40682356 Free PMC article.
-
Performance characteristics allow for confinement of a CRISPR toxin-antidote gene drive for population suppression in a reaction-diffusion model.Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jun;291(2025):20240500. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0500. Epub 2024 Jun 19. Proc Biol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38889790 Free PMC article.
-
Manipulating the Destiny of Wild Populations Using CRISPR.Annu Rev Genet. 2023 Nov 27;57:361-390. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-031623-105059. Epub 2023 Sep 18. Annu Rev Genet. 2023. PMID: 37722684 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of distant-site rescue elements for CRISPR toxin-antidote gene drives.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Feb 13;11:1138702. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1138702. eCollection 2023. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 36860883 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Adams, K. L., Abernathy, D. G., Willett, B. C., Selland, E. K., Itoe, M. A., & Catteruccia, F. (2021). Wolbachia cifB induces cytoplasmic incompatibility in the malaria mosquito vector. Nature Microbiology, 6(12), 1575-1582. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00998-6
-
- Adolfi, A., Gantz, V. M., Jasinskiene, N., Lee, H. F., Hwang, K., Terradas, G., Bulger, E. A., Ramaiah, A., Bennett, J. B., Emerson, J. J., Marshall, J. M., Bier, E., & James, A. A. (2020). Efficient population modification gene-drive rescue system in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19426-0
-
- Altrock, P. M., Traulsen, A., & Reed, F. A. (2011). Stability properties of underdominance in finite subdivided populations. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(11), e1002260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002260
-
- Altrock, P. M., Traulsen, A., Reeves, R. G., & Reed, F. A. (2010). Using underdominance to bi-stably transform local populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 267(1), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.08.004
-
- Anderson, M. A. E., Gonzalez, E., Ang, J. X. D., Shackleford, L., Nevard, K., Verkuijl, S. A. N., Edgington, M. P., Harvey-Samuel, T., & Alphey, L. (2023). Closing the gap to effective gene drive in Aedes aegypti by exploiting germline regulatory elements. Nature Communications, 14(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36029-7
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources