Comprehensive Clinical-Pathologic Assessment of Malignant Phyllodes Tumors: Proposing Refined Diagnostic Criteria
- PMID: 37694517
- DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002109
Comprehensive Clinical-Pathologic Assessment of Malignant Phyllodes Tumors: Proposing Refined Diagnostic Criteria
Abstract
The latest World Health Organization classification of breast tumors recommends diagnosing malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) when all 5 morphologic features are present: permeative borders, marked stromal cellularity, marked stromal cytologic atypia, ≥10 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (HPF), and stromal overgrowth. We assessed the performance of this recommendation to capture MPTs and features predictive of distant metastasis in a multi-institutional retrospective study. Of 65 MPTs, most cases had at least focally permeative borders (58, 89%), with marked stromal cellularity in 40 (61.5%), marked atypia in 38 (58.5%), ≥10 mitoses per 10 HPF in 50 (77%), and stromal overgrowth in 56 (86%). Distant metastases were observed in 20 (31%) patients (median follow-up 24.5 mo, 1 to 204). Only 13 of 65 (20%) cases had all 5 morphologic features, while only 7 of 20 (35%) cases with distant metastases had all 5 features. In univariate analysis, only marked stromal atypia ( P =0.004) and cellularity ( P =0.017) were associated with decreased distant metastasis-free survival. In multivariate Cox regression, the combination of stromal overgrowth, marked stromal cellularity, and atypia (C-index 0.721, 95% CI: 0.578, 0.863) was associated with decreased distant metastasis-free survival. The current World Health Organization recommendation will miss a significant number of MPTs with distant metastases. We propose refined diagnostic criteria for MPTs: (1) stromal overgrowth combined with ≥1 feature(s) (marked cellularity, marked atypia, or ≥10 mitoses per 10 HPF), or (2) in the absence of stromal overgrowth, marked cellularity combined with ≥1 feature(s) (permeative borders, marked atypia, or ≥10 mitoses per 10 HPF).
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article.
References
-
- Chua CL, Thomas A, Ng BK. Cystosarcoma phyllodes--Asian variations. Aust N Z J Surg. 1988;58:301–305.
-
- Bernstein L, Deapen D, Ross RK. The descriptive epidemiology of malignant cystosarcoma phyllodes tumors of the breast. Cancer. 1993;71:3020–3024.
-
- Tan PH, Thike AA, Tan WJ, et al. Predicting clinical behaviour of breast phyllodes tumours: a nomogram based on histological criteria and surgical margins. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:69–76.
-
- Zhou ZR, Wang CC, Sun XJ, et al. Prognostic factors in breast phyllodes tumors: a nomogram based on a retrospective cohort study of 404 patients. Cancer Med. 2018;7:1030–1042.
-
- Co M, Chen C, Tsang JY, et al. Mammary phyllodes tumour: a 15-year multicentre clinical review. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71:493–497.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources