Genome-wide association study and the randomized controlled trial: A false equivalence
- PMID: 37694937
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X22002230
Genome-wide association study and the randomized controlled trial: A false equivalence
Abstract
Madole & Harden's assertion that the effects derived from within-family genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are equivalent is misleading. GWASs are substantially more "non-unitary, non-uniform, and non-explanatory" than RCTs. While the within-family GWAS bring us closer to identifying genetic causes, whether it will change behavioral genetics into a causal science is an open question.
Comment in
-
Causal complexity in human research: On the shared challenges of behavior genetics, medical genetics, and environmentally oriented social science.Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 11;46:e206. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23000833. Behav Brain Sci. 2023. PMID: 37694936
Comment on
-
Building causal knowledge in behavior genetics.Behav Brain Sci. 2022 May 5;46:e182. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22000681. Behav Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35510303
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources