Comparison of measurements of cardiac output by bioimpedance and thermodilution in severely ill surgical patients
- PMID: 3769504
- DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198611000-00004
Comparison of measurements of cardiac output by bioimpedance and thermodilution in severely ill surgical patients
Abstract
In order to evaluate a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) system for measurement of stroke volume based on the Sramek-Bernstein equation, 391 paired values of cardiac output were measured simultaneously with the standard thermodilution method. These values were obtained from 16 patients selected for having the most severe illness during a 6-month period; the intent was to evaluate the bioimpedance method in the worst possible situations. The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.83, slope was 0.87, intercept was 1.53, and the mean difference between the two methods was 16.2 +/- 11.8 (SD)% in the total series. In 285 paired samples where satisfactory conditions were met, r was 0.90, slope was 0.98, intercept was 0.34, and the mean difference was 11.8 +/- 8.9%. The data indicate satisfactory correlations between these two methods. When the TEB waveform is satisfactory, the agreement between TEB and thermodilution is as good as the agreement between serial thermodilution methods. Difficulties may arise with dysrhythmias, tachycardia (heart rate greater than 150 beat/min), metal in the chest or chest wall, sepsis, hypertension, and extremely oily skin. Mechanical ventilation did not appear to be a problem.
Similar articles
-
Determination of cardiac output during positive end-expiratory pressure--noninvasive electrical bioimpedance compared with standard thermodilution.Crit Care Med. 1990 May;18(5):544-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199005000-00017. Crit Care Med. 1990. PMID: 2183967
-
Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.Clin Intensive Care. 1993;4(5):217-21. Clin Intensive Care. 1993. PMID: 10146700
-
Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement.Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;28(6):1798-802. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00017. Crit Care Med. 2000. PMID: 10890622
-
Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution.Crit Care Med. 1995 Oct;23(10):1667-73. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199510000-00010. Crit Care Med. 1995. PMID: 7587231 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.J Trauma. 1991 Aug;31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1. J Trauma. 1991. PMID: 1875438
Cited by
-
Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output.Ann Biomed Eng. 1989;17(5):495-505. doi: 10.1007/BF02368069. Ann Biomed Eng. 1989. PMID: 2610421
-
Cardiac output in 1998.Heart. 1998 May;79(5):425-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.79.5.425. Heart. 1998. PMID: 9659184 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
A novel noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.Clin Cardiol. 2010 Feb;33(2):E8-14. doi: 10.1002/clc.20612. Clin Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20043339 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical review: New technologies -- venturing out of the intensive care unit.Crit Care. 2005 Jun;9(3):296-302. doi: 10.1186/cc2982. Epub 2004 Nov 2. Crit Care. 2005. PMID: 15987384 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of electrical velocimetry and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the non-invasive determination of cardiac output.J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Aug;30(4):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9731-6. Epub 2015 Jun 27. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016. PMID: 26115774
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous