Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;53(3):525-536.
doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04445-x. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

Perspectives and institutional policies on patient safety and image quality regarding the use of knee-spanning external fixators in MRI: A survey study of the Society of Skeletal Radiology

Aaron J Marcel  1 , Erin F Alaia  2 , Michael J Alaia  3 , Lee D Katz  4 , Michael J Medvecky  5 , Jack Porrino  4
Affiliations

Perspectives and institutional policies on patient safety and image quality regarding the use of knee-spanning external fixators in MRI: A survey study of the Society of Skeletal Radiology

Aaron J Marcel et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Concerns regarding patient safety and image quality have made the use of knee-spanning external fixators in MRI a challenging clinical scenario. The purpose of our study was to poll practicing musculoskeletal radiologists on their personal experiences regarding the use of knee-spanning external fixators in MRI in an effort to consolidate practice trends for the radiologists' benefit.

Methods: A 27-item survey was created to address the institutional use, safety, adverse events, quality, and perspectives of the radiologist related to MRI of an externally fixated knee. The survey was distributed to 1739 members of the Society of Skeletal Radiology.

Results: A total of 72 members of the Society of Skeletal Radiology completed the survey. Most notably, 40 of 72 (55.56%) respondents are permitted to place a knee-spanning external fixator inside the MR bore at their institution, while19 of 72 (26.39%) respondents are not permitted to do so. Fourteen of 32 (43.75%) respondents have institutional guidelines for safely performing an MRI of an externally fixated knee. Twenty-five of 32 (78.13%) respondents are comfortable permitting an MRI of an externally fixated knee.

Conclusion: We found a general lack of consensus regarding the decision to scan a patient with a knee-spanning external fixator in MRI. Many institutions lack safety guidelines, and providers rely upon a heterogeneous breadth of resources for safety information. A re-examination of the FDA device labeling nomenclature and expectations of the individual manufacturers may be needed to bridge this gap and help direct management decisions placed upon the provider.

Keywords: External fixator; Institutional policies; Knee dislocation; MRI; MRI quality; Patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Maslaris A, Brinkmann O, Bungartz M, Krettek C, Jagodzinski M, Liodakis E. Management of knee dislocation prior to ligament reconstruction: what is the current evidence? Update of a universal treatment algorithm. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28(6):1001–15. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cramer C, Frosch KH. External fixator for temporary stabilization of complex periarticular knee fractures. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020;32(5):410–20. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fanelli GC. Multiple ligament injured knee: initial assessment and treatment. Clin Sports Med. 2019;38(2):193–8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodier WD, Calder PR. External fixation for the correction of adult post-traumatic deformities. Injury. 2019;50(Suppl 1):S36-44. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simpson AHRW, Robiati L, Jalal MMK, Tsang STJ. Non-union: indications for external fixation. Injury. 2019;50(Suppl 1):S73–8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources