Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 11;16(1):208.
doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06469-x.

Use of electronic health record data mining for heart failure subtyping

Affiliations

Use of electronic health record data mining for heart failure subtyping

Matti A Vuori et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether electronic health record (EHR) data text mining can be used to improve register-based heart failure (HF) subtyping. EHR data of 43,405 individuals from two Finnish hospital biobanks were mined for unstructured text mentions of ejection fraction (EF) and validated against clinical assessment in two sets of 100 randomly selected individuals. Structured laboratory data was then incorporated for a categorization by HF subtype (HF with mildly reduced EF, HFmrEF; HF with preserved EF, HFpEF; HF with reduced EF, HFrEF; and no HF).

Results: In 86% of the cases, the algorithm-identified EF belonged to the correct HF subtype range. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the algorithm were 94-100% for HFrEF, 85-100% for HFmrEF, and 96%, 67%, 53% and 98% for HFpEF. Survival analyses using the traditional diagnosis of HF were in concordance with the algorithm-based ones. Compared to healthy individuals, mortality increased from HFmrEF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.95) to HFpEF (2.28; 1.80-2.88) to HFrEF group (2.63; 1.97-3.50) over a follow-up of 1.5 years. We conclude that quantitative EF data can be efficiently extracted from EHRs and used with laboratory data to subtype HF with reasonable accuracy, especially for HFrEF.

Keywords: Data mining; Ejection fraction; Electronic health records; HFmrEF; HFpEF; HFrEF; Heart failure; Text mining.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The principle of the EF mining algorithm Abbreviations: EF, ejection fraction; EHR, electronic health records; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (< 40%); HFmrEF, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (40–49%); HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (≥ 50%)

References

    1. Janssens SP. Gene therapy for heart failure. Hear Fail Second Ed. 2012;457–73.
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors A, Anker AD, Bueno S, Cleland HGF, Coats JJS. 2016 ESC GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC HEART FAILURE. Russ J Cardiol. 2017;18(1):7–81. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2017-1-7-81. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Povl Munk-Jørgensen Aksel Bertelsen AADKLELKT Implementation of ICD-10 in the nordic countries. Nord J Psychiatry. 1999;53(1):5–9. doi: 10.1080/080394899426648. - DOI
    1. WHO. International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision [Internet]. [cited 2019 Sep 9]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en (2018.
    1. FinnGen. FinnGen Documentation of R4 release [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://finngen.gitbook.io/documentation/