Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 12;9(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9.

ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants: indications, evaluation of surgical techniques and long-term treatment outcomes

Affiliations
Review

ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants: indications, evaluation of surgical techniques and long-term treatment outcomes

Bilal Al-Nawas et al. Int J Implant Dent. .

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the ITI Consensus Workshop on zygomatic implants was to provide Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for the use of zygomatic implants.

Materials and methods: Three systematic reviews and one narrative review were written to address focused questions on (1) the indications for the use of zygomatic implants; (2) the survival rates and complications associated with surgery in zygomatic implant placement; (3) long-term survival rates of zygomatic implants and (4) the biomechanical principles involved when zygoma implants are placed under functional loads. Based on the reviews, three working groups then developed Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations. These were discussed in a plenary and finalized in Delphi rounds.

Results: A total of 21 Consensus Statements were developed from the systematic reviews. Additionally, the group developed 17 Clinical Recommendations based on the Consensus Statements and the combined expertise of the participants.

Conclusions: Zygomatic implants are mainly indicated in cases with maxillary bone atrophy or deficiency. Long-term mean zygomatic implant survival was 96.2% [95% CI 93.8; 97.7] over a mean follow-up of 75.4 months (6.3 years) with a follow-up range of 36-141.6 months (3-11.8 years). Immediate loading showed a statistically significant increase in survival over delayed loading. Sinusitis presented with a total prevalence of 14.2% [95% CI 8.8; 22.0] over a mean 65.4 months follow-up, representing the most common complication which may lead to zygomatic implant loss. The international experts suggested clinical recommendations regarding planning, surgery, restoration, outcomes, and the patient's perspective.

Keywords: Atrophic maxilla; Complications; Edentulous; Survival; Zygomatic implants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Polido WD, Machado-Fernandez A, Lin WS, Aghaloo T. Indications for zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Int J implant Dent. 2023;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00480-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kammerer PW, Fan S, Aparicio C, Bedrossian E, Davo R, Morton D, et al. Evaluation of surgical techniques in survival rate and complications of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00478-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bedrossian E, Brunski J, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW. Zygoma implant under function: biomechanical principles clarified. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00483-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennand Roper M, Vissink A, Dudding T, Pollard A, Gareb B, Malevez C, et al. Long-term treatment outcomes with zygomatic implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00479-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources