Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Sep 12;20(1):136.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01684-y.

Genital mycoplasma infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Genital mycoplasma infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chen Cheng et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have suggested that genital mycoplasma infections may be associated with male infertility. However, this association remains controversial due to time lapse, sample size, and regional prevalence.

Objectives: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the relationship between genital mycoplasma and male infertility through a meta-analysis and to provide a basis for the clinical management of male infertility.

Methods: We conducted a search on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases, from January 2000 to June 2023 to identify case-control studies on the interrelationship between genital mycoplasma infection and male infertility. Two independent researchers performed an assessment of the methodological quality of trials according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and extracted data strictly based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and afterward, we carried out a meta-analysis using Stata 16.0. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess this relationship.

Results: This meta-analysis included 21 studies from seven countries with a total of 53025 infertility cases and 6435 controls; the age range of the participating men was from 20 to 59 years old. The results obtained showed a higher prevalence of M. genitalium, M. hominis and U. urealyticum infections in infertile men than in the controls, with the opposite result for U. parvum (M. genitalium, OR, 3.438 [95% CI: 1.780, 6.643], with P = 0.000; M. hominis, OR, 1.840 [95% CI: 1.013, 3.343], with P = 0.045; U. urealyticum, OR, 3.278 [95% CI: 2.075, 5.180], with P = 0.000; U. parvum, OR, 1.671 [95% CI: 0.947, 2.950], with P = 0.077). Further, two subgroup analyses also showed that M. hominis and U. urealyticum infections were strongly associated with male infertility in China (M. hominis, P = 0.009; U. urealyticum, P = 0.000); however, M. hominis and U. urealyticum infection was not strongly associated with male infertility worldwide (M. hominis, P = 0.553; U. urealyticum, P = 0.050).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed that male infertility was significantly associated with M. genitalium, M. hominis and U. urealyticum infections, while U. parvum infection was not. Further, our study showed that genital mycoplasma infection influences male infertility and provides a basis for future treatment.

Keywords: Genital mycoplasma; Infection; Male infertility; Meta-analysis; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for PRISMA-based literature screening
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Forest plot for the association of M. genitalium infection and male infertility. B Funnel plots for inclusion in studies of M. genitalium infection and male infertility
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A Forest plot for the association of M. hominis infection and male infertility. B Funnel plots for inclusion in studies of M. hominis infection and male infertility
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A Forest plot for the association of U. urealyticum infection and male infertility. B Funnel plots for inclusion in studies of U. urealyticum infection and male infertility
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A Forest plot for the association of U. parvum infection and male infertility. B Funnel plots for inclusion in studies of U. parvum infection and male infertility

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krausz C, Riera-Escamilla A. Genetics of male infertility. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15(6):369–384. doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0003-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inhorn MC, Pasquale P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;4:411. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batiha O, Al-Deeb T, Al-zoubi E, Alsharu E. Impact of COVID-19 and other viruses on reproductive health. Andrologia. 2020;52(9):e13791. doi: 10.1111/and.13791. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nassan FL, Chavarro JE, Cigdem T. Diet and men’s fertility: does diet affect sperm quality? Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):570–577. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skoracka K, Eder P, Łykowska-Szuber L, Dobrowolska A, Krela-Kaźmierczak I. Diet and nutritional factors in male (in) fertility—underestimated factors. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1400. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051400. - DOI - PMC - PubMed