Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;25(10):2043-2053.
doi: 10.1111/codi.16737. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study

EuroSurg Collaborative†
Collaborators

Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery: An international, prospective cohort study

EuroSurg Collaborative†. Colorectal Dis. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: Intraperitoneal drains are often placed during emergency colorectal surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery.

Method: COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS) is a prospective, international, cohort study into which consecutive adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery were enrolled (from 3 February 2020 to 8 March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included rate and time-to-diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections, rate of surgical site infections (SSIs), time to discharge and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V). Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the independent association of the outcomes with drain placement.

Results: Some 725 patients (median age 68.0 years; 349 [48.1%] women) from 22 countries were included. The drain insertion rate was 53.7% (389 patients). Following multivariable adjustment, drains were not significantly associated with reduced rates (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 0.48-5.02, p = 0.457) or earlier detection (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.61-1.90, p = 0.805) of collections. Drains were not significantly associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.67-2.36, p = 0.478), delayed hospital discharge (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91-1.36, p = 0.303) or increased risk of SSIs (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.87-2.99, p = 0.128).

Conclusion: This is the first study investigating placement of intraperitoneal drains following emergency colorectal surgery. The safety and clinical benefit of drains remain uncertain. Equipoise exists for randomized trials to define the safety and efficacy of drains in emergency colorectal surgery.

Keywords: drain; emergency colorectal surgery; postoperative outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Memon MA, Memon MI, Donohue JH. Abdominal drains: a brief historical review. Ir Med J. 2001;94:164-166.
    1. Puleo F, Mishra N, Hall J. Use of intra-abdominal drains. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26:174-177.
    1. O'Connor T, Hugh T. Abdominal drainage: a clinical review. Aust N Z J Surg. 1979;49:253-260.
    1. Mujagic E, Zeindler J, Coslovsky M, Hoffmann H, Soysal SD, Mechera R, et al. The association of surgical drains with surgical site infections - a prospective observational study. Am J Surg. 2019;217:17-23.
    1. Denost Q, Rouanet P, Faucheron JL, Panis Y, Meunier B, Cotte E, et al. To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer. Ann Surg. 2017;265:474-480.

LinkOut - more resources