Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2023 Nov 6;78(11):2672-2682.
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad280.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme

Antoni Torres et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. .

Abstract

Objectives: This post hoc pooled analysis evaluated clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety in patients with infections caused by β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens across five Phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicentre trials of ceftazidime/avibactam in adults with complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI)/pyelonephritis and nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

Methods: In each trial, RECLAIM/RECLAIM 3 (cIAI), REPRISE (cIAI/cUTI), RECAPTURE (cUTI) and REPROVE (NP, including VAP) patients were randomized 1:1 to IV ceftazidime/avibactam (plus metronidazole for patients with cIAI) or comparators (carbapenems in >97% patients) for 5-21 days. Clinical and microbiological responses at the test-of-cure visit were assessed for patients with ESBLs, and/or plasmidic and/or overexpression of chromosomal AmpC, and/or serine carbapenemases without MBLs identified in baseline Gram-negative isolates by phenotypic screening and molecular characterization in the pooled microbiological modified ITT (mMITT) population.

Results: In total, 813 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 389; comparator, n = 424) had ≥1 β-lactamase-producing baseline pathogen identified, amongst whom 792 patients (ceftazidime/avibactam, n = 379; comparator, n = 413) had no MBLs. The most frequent β-lactamase-producing pathogens across treatment groups were Escherichia coli (n = 381), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 261) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 53). Clinical cure rates in the pooled non-MBL β-lactamase-producing mMITT population were 88.1% (334/379) for ceftazidime/avibactam and 88.1% (364/413) for comparators; favourable microbiological response rates were 76.5% (290/379) and 68.8% (284/413), respectively. The safety profile of ceftazidime/avibactam was consistent with previous observations.

Conclusions: This analysis provides supportive evidence of the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by ESBLs, AmpC and serine carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens.

Trial registration: NCT01499290; NCT01726023; NCT01644643; NCT01595438/NCT01599806; NCT01808092.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of MIC screen test and molecular characterization outcomes to identify patients with β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens (pooled mMITT population). Patients could have ≥1 pathogen. Multiple isolates of the same species from the same patient are counted only once. Baseline isolates that met CLSI MIC criteria (see Supplementary Methods) were candidates for molecular analyses, which included testing for ESBL and AmpC and/or carbapenemases.

References

    1. Woerther PL, Burdet C, Chachaty E et al. Trends in human fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the community: toward the globalization of CTX-M. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013; 26: 744–58. 10.1128/CMR.00023-13 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. CDC . Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/2019-ar-threats-re....
    1. Bush K. Past and present perspectives on β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62: e01076-18. 10.1128/AAC.01076-18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cantón R, Loza E, Aznar J et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility trends and evolution of isolates with extended spectrum β-lactamases among Gram-negative organisms recovered during the SMART study in Spain (2011-2015). Rev Esp Quimioter 2018; 31: 136–45. https://seq.es/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/canton12mar2018.pdf - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 guidance on the treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75: 187–212. 10.1093/cid/ciac268 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data