Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 28:10:1189664.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1189664. eCollection 2023.

Are genetic drift and stem cell adherence in laboratory culture issues for cultivated meat production?

Affiliations
Review

Are genetic drift and stem cell adherence in laboratory culture issues for cultivated meat production?

Manuel Jaime-Rodríguez et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cell-based cultivated meat is a promising solution to the ecological and ethical problems posed by traditional meat production, since it exhibits a protein content and composition that is more comparable to original meat proteins than any other source of cultivated meat products, including plants, bacteria, and fungi. Nonetheless, the nature and laboratory behavior of mesenchymal stem cells pose two significant challenges for large-scale production: genetic drift and adherent growth in culture. Culture conditions used in the laboratory expose the cells to a selective pressure that causes genetic drift, which may give rise to oncogene activation and the loss of "stemness." This is why genetic and functional analysis of the cells during culture is required to determine the maximum number of passages within the laboratory where no significant mutations or loss of function are detected. Moreover, the adherent growth of mesenchymal stem cells can be an obstacle for their large-scale production since volume to surface ratio is limited for high volume containers. Multi-tray systems, roller bottles, and microcarriers have been proposed as potential solutions to scale-up the production of adherent cells required for cultivated meat. The most promising solutions for the safety problems and large-scale obstacles for cultivated meat production are the determination of a limit number of passages based on a genetic analysis and the use of microcarriers from edible materials to maximize the volume to surface proportion and decrease the downstream operations needed for cultivated meat production.

Keywords: cultivated meat; genetic drift; mesenchymal stem cells; passages; quality control; stemness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Animal stem cell-based cultivated meat production process. Tissue is extracted from an animal (pig, chicken, beef), following which, stem cells are isolated and grown in a laboratory to expand them. Finally, the cells are differentiated into muscle or fat tissue to engineer the final meat product.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Minimum quality control tests for mesenchymal stem cells used for cultivated meat production based on pharmaceutical guidelines. The proposed tests can be divided in three main groups: Genetic studies (oncogene activation and genetic stability), Safety studies (Mycoplasma detection, Sterility test, Viral detection and Tumorigenic profile) and Functional studies (Differentiation test).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic representation of the most used techniques to scale-up mesenchymal stem cell production. (A) Multi-tray system, optimized T-flasks with multiple stacked growth surfaces. (B) Roller bottles, cylindrical container incubated in a roller machine to enhance the growth surface. (C) Microcarriers, spherical particles suspended in agitated medium.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations (2019). World population prospects 2019: Data booklet. New York, NY: Department of Economic Social Affairs, p. 1–25.
    1. OECD/FAO . MEAT In: Agricultural Outlook 2021–2030. Paris: OECD publishing; (2021)
    1. Bhat ZF, Morton JD, Mason SL, Bekhit AEDA, Bhat HF. Technological, regulatory, and ethical aspects of in vitro meat: a future slaughter-free harvest. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2019) 18:1192–208. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12473, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laranjo M, Talon R, Lauková A, Fraqueza MJ, Elias M. Traditional meat products: improvement of quality and safety. J Food Qual. (2017) 2017, Article ID 2873793:1–2. doi: 10.1155/2017/2873793 - DOI
    1. Morais TG, Teixeira RFM, Domingos T. The effects on greenhouse gas emissions of ecological intensification of meat production with Rainfed sown biodiverse pastures. Sustainability. (2018) 10:4184. doi: 10.3390/su10114184 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources