Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 31:35:e29.
doi: 10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e29. eCollection 2023.

Association between lone work and self-rated health status: using the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey

Affiliations

Association between lone work and self-rated health status: using the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey

Eunseun Han et al. Ann Occup Environ Med. .

Abstract

Background: Lone workers are generally defined as individuals who work alone without supervision, including self-employed people. While lone workers are considered a vulnerable group in some countries, there is a lack of research on their health status in domestic studies. Globally, the number of lone workers has been increasing, and this trend has been further accelerated since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with the rise of remote work.

Methods: The study analyzed data from 44,281 participants, excluding unpaid family workers, soldiers, and those with missing data. Lone workers were defined as individuals who reported having no colleagues with the same job at their current workplace. Self-rated health status was categorized as "good" or "poor."

Results: This study found a statistically significant higher number of lone workers among women compare to men. The largest occupational category for lone workers was service and sales workers, followed by agriculture and fisheries workers. A majority of non-lone workers reported working 40 hours or less per week, while the majority of lone workers reported working 53 hours or more per week. In addition, lone workers had significantly poorer health status evaluations compared to non-lone workers (odds ratio: 1.297; 95% confidence interval: 1.165-1.444).

Conclusions: Further research is needed to investigate the causal relationship between lone work and health, using data collected after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; Isolated work; KWCS; Lone work; Self-rated health status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram depicting study population.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Health and Safety Executive. Working Alone: Health and Safety Guidance on the Risks of Lone Working. London, UK: HSE Books; 2009.
    1. Brennan W. Managing risks to lone workers. Occup Health Wellbeing. 2012;64(12):27.
    1. Myers K. Identifying a Lone Worker: When Lone Doesn’t Mean Alone. Calgary, Canada: Blackline Safety; 2015.
    1. Yanar B, Lay M, Smith PM. The interplay between supervisor safety support and occupational health and safety vulnerability on work injury. Saf Health Work. 2019;10(2):172–179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Government of Western Australia. Guidance Note: Working Alone. Perth, Australia: 2009.

LinkOut - more resources