Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 6:16:3075-3084.
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S422197. eCollection 2023.

Development of the Chronic Pain Cognition Scale: A Culture-Sensitive Pain Measurement in Chinese

Chih-Hsun Wu  1   2 , Wei-Han Chou  3 , Yi-Hsun Long  2 , Hao-Han Yang  1 , Tung Lin  1 , Chi-Cheng Yang  1   4 , Wei-Zen Sun  3 , Chih-Cheng Chen  5 , Chih-Peng Lin  3
Affiliations

Development of the Chronic Pain Cognition Scale: A Culture-Sensitive Pain Measurement in Chinese

Chih-Hsun Wu et al. J Pain Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: People with pain problems are highly vulnerable to cultural disparities, and it is imperative to reduce these inequalities. This cross-sectional study aimed to develop a culturally sensitive Chronic Pain Cognition Scale (CPCS) for Chinese-/Chinese dialect-speaking populations and investigate its psychometric properties.

Patients and methods: Adult patients with chronic low back pain or chronic neck pain who visited pain clinics at a medical center in northern Taiwan were enrolled. Participants completed the demographic, intensity of pain, and two other related sensations, "Sng ()" and "Ma ()", often reported in Chinese-speaking populations, CPCS, Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.

Results: 200 patients were included. Patients' mean age was 64.84 ± 14.33, 126 (63.0%) were female, and 83 (41.5%) had 13+ years of education. The average duration of pain was 77.25 ± 97.46 months, the intensity of pain was 6.04 ± 2.50, Ma was 3.43 ± 3.24, and Sng was 4.54 ± 3.14. The CPCS comprised four factors: pain impact (how pain impact one's life), losing face (how one being disrespected due to pain), helplessness, and avoidance, with good structural validity and adequate reliability (Cronbach α, 0.60-0.81) and satisfactory criterion-related validity. Moreover, losing face, an essential concept in Chinese relationalism, was significantly related to pain, Sng, and Ma (r = 0.19, 0.15 and 0.16), but not to pain acceptance or self-efficacy, indicating a culturally specific element in pain measurement.

Conclusion: The CPCS has good psychometric properties and is suitable for evaluating chronic pain in the clinical setting, and might be generalizable to other Chinese-/Chinese dialect-speaking populations.

Keywords: avoidance; helplessness; losing face; low back pain; neck pain; pain impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated standardized coefficients in confirmatory factor analysis of the Chronic Pain Cognition Scale (CPCS).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Merskey HE. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. PAIN. 1986;3(Suppl.):216–221. - PubMed
    1. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). IASP Announces Revised Definition of Pain; 2020. Available from: https://www.iasp-pain.org/PublicationsNews/NewsDetail.aspx?ItemNumber=10475. Accessed December 29, 2020.
    1. Khalatbari-Soltani S, Blyth FM. Socioeconomic position and pain: a topical review. PAIN. 2022;16310:1855–1861. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002634 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahim-Williams B, Riley JL, Williams AKK, Fillingim RB. A quantitative review of ethnic group differences in experimental pain response: do biology, psychology, and culture matter? Pain Med. 2012;134:522–540. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01336.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell CM, Edwards RR. Ethnic differences in pain and pain management. Pain Manag. 2012;23:219–230. doi:10.2217/pmt.12.7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed