A scale to measure the worry level in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy with sedation: Development, reliability, and validity
- PMID: 37701761
- PMCID: PMC10493257
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100410
A scale to measure the worry level in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy with sedation: Development, reliability, and validity
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop a scale to measure the worry level of patients who will undergo gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy with deep sedation, and to provide scientific references to alleviate their worries.
Method: Based on literature review, panel discussion, patient interview and expert consultation, we developed the first version of the scale. After two pre-investigations, the formal version of the scale was formed, and the reliability and validity were tested on 1389 respondents. Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the Spearman correlations analysis.
Results: The scale was composed of four dimensions: financial and time costs, sedation, examination, and psychology. It has 15 items. Reliability and validity were acceptable. The Cronbach's alpha of the whole scale was 0.959 and all the factor loadings were > 0.50. The Spearman correlations of the inter-dimensions ranged from 0.614 to 0.836, and the correlation coefficients between the dimensions and the total score were 0.795 to 0.957. The correlation coefficient between the total scale score and the APAIS was 0.833.
Conclusions: This scale has good validity and reliability, which is useful for physicians and medical institutions to take appropriate measures to reduce patients' worries.
Keywords: Reliability; Scale development; Sedation Gastrointestinal Endoscopy; Validity; Worry.
© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
None.The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability.Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;9:760647. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.760647. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34988047 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Modified Breast Cancer Worry Scale.Iran J Public Health. 2018 Nov;47(11):1681-1687. Iran J Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30581784 Free PMC article.
-
Developing and Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Brief Adolescent Respiratory System Health Assessment Scale-Student Version in a Chinese Sample.Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 17;9:713066. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.713066. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34485202 Free PMC article.
-
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9. Encephale. 2004. PMID: 15627048 Review. French.
-
Reliability generalization meta-analysis of the Climate Change Worry Scale.Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1590126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1590126. eCollection 2025. Front Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40351577 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the maternity-monitoring scale by parents.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07880-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40676571 Free PMC article.
-
Nurse-Administered Sedation in Digestive Endoscopy: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 17;15(8):1030. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15081030. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40310421 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient satisfaction and safety in the administration of sedation by nursing staff in the digestive endoscopy service: a cross-sectional study.BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 28;23(1):953. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02644-y. BMC Nurs. 2024. PMID: 39731089 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Anxiety in Endoscopy: A Comparative Analysis of Single vs. Dual Procedure Effects.Cureus. 2024 Mar 30;16(3):e57237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57237. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38686224 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aljebreen A.M., Alswat K., Almadi M.A. Appropriateness and diagnostic yield of upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in an open-access endoscopy system. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology : Official Journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association. 2013;19(5):219–222. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.118128. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Arnáez S., García-Soriano G., López-Santiago J., Belloch A. The Spanish validation of the short health anxiety inventory: Psychometric properties and clinical utility. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology : IJCHP. 2019;19(3):251–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.05.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources