Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024:2716:241-264.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3449-3_11.

Alchemical Free Energy Workflows for the Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities

Anna M Herz  1 , Tahsin Kellici  2   3 , Inaki Morao  2 , Julien Michel  4
Affiliations

Alchemical Free Energy Workflows for the Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities

Anna M Herz et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2024.

Abstract

Alchemical free energy methods can be used for the efficient computation of relative binding free energies during preclinical drug discovery stages. In recent years, this has been facilitated further by the implementation of workflows that enable non-experts to quickly and consistently set up the required simulations. Given the correct input structures, workflows handle the difficult aspects of setting up perturbations, including consistently defining the perturbable molecule, its atom mapping and topology generation, perturbation network generation, running of the simulations via different sampling methods, and analysis of the results. Different academic and commercial workflows are discussed, including FEW, FESetup, FEPrepare, CHARMM-GUI, Transformato, PMX, QLigFEP, TIES, ProFESSA, PyAutoFEP, BioSimSpace, FEP+, Flare, and Orion. These workflows differ in various aspects, such as mapping algorithms or enhanced sampling methods. Some workflows can accommodate more than one molecular dynamics (MD) engine and use external libraries for tasks. Differences between workflows can present advantages for different use cases, however a lack of interoperability of the workflows' components hinders systematic comparisons.

Keywords: AFE; Alchemical free energy methods; FEP; Free energy perturbation; RBFE; Relative binding free energies; Workflows.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Song LF, Merz KM Jr (2020) Evolution of alchemical free energy methods in drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 60(11):5308–5318. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00547 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedrichs MS, Eastman P, Vaidyanathan V, Houston M, Legrand S, Beberg AL, Ensign DL, Bruns CM, Pande VS (2009) Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units. J Comput Chem 30(6):864–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21209 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Cournia Z, Allen B, Sherman W (2017) Relative binding free energy calculations in drug discovery: recent advances and practical considerations. J Chem Inf Model 57(12):2911–2937. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00564 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salomon-Ferrer R, Case DA, Walker RC (2013) An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 3(2):198–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1121 - DOI
    1. Chen H, Maia JDC, Radak BK, Hardy DJ, Cai W, Chipot C, Tajkhorshid E (2020) Boosting free-energy perturbation calculations with GPU-accelerated NAMD. J Chem Inf Model 60(11):5301–5307. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00745 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources