Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov;7(6):963-974.
doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00437-8. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

The EQ-5D-3L Valuation Study in Pakistan

Affiliations

The EQ-5D-3L Valuation Study in Pakistan

Madeeha Malik et al. Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Background: To utilize EQ-5D in economic evaluations, a societal-based value set is needed. To date, no value sets exist for any EQ-5D instrument in Pakistan. Previous EQ-5D studies conducted in Pakistan 'borrowed' health preferences developed in other countries. However, for a value set to be valid for Pakistani population, it should represent the preferences of the Pakistani population, and culture and living standards of Pakistan.

Objective: The aim of this study was to derive a Pakistani EQ-5D-3L value set.

Methods: A moderately representative sample aged 18 years and over was recruited from the Pakistani general population. A multi-stage stratified quota method with respect to ethnicity, gender, age and religion was utilized. Two elicitation techniques, the composite time trade-off (cTTO) and discrete choice experiments (DCE) were applied. Interviews were undertaken by trained interviewers using computer-assisted face-to-face interviews with the EuroQol Portable Valuation Technology (EQ-PVT) platform. To estimate the value set, a hybrid regression model combining cTTO and DCE data was used.

Results: A total of 289 respondents who completed the interviews were included for the analysis. The hybrid model correcting for heteroskedasticity without a constant was selected as the final model for the value set. It is shown that being unable to do usual activities (level 3) was assigned the largest weight, followed by mobility level 3, self-care level 3, pain/discomfort level 3 and anxiety/depression level 3. The worst health state was assigned the value - 0.171 in the final model.

Conclusions: A Pakistani country-specific EQ-5D-3L value set is now available. The availability of this value set may help promote and facilitate health economic evaluations and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) research in Pakistan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following authors are members of the EuroQol Research Foundation (the copyright holders of EQ-5D-5L): NYG, BR and FDP. There are no other conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Predicted versus mean observed cTTO values for cTTO models
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Predicted versus mean observed values for hybrid models

Similar articles

  • The Indonesian EQ-5D-5L Value Set.
    Purba FD, Hunfeld JAM, Iskandarsyah A, Fitriana TS, Sadarjoen SS, Ramos-Goñi JM, Passchier J, Busschbach JJV. Purba FD, et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Nov;35(11):1153-1165. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0538-9. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017. PMID: 28695543 Free PMC article.
  • Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L in Russia.
    Omelyanovskiy V, Musina N, Ratushnyak S, Bezdenezhnykh T, Fediaeva V, Roudijk B, Purba FD. Omelyanovskiy V, et al. Qual Life Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):1997-2007. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02804-6. Epub 2021 Mar 13. Qual Life Res. 2021. PMID: 33713323 Free PMC article.
  • A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
    Ferreira PL, Antunes P, Ferreira LN, Pereira LN, Ramos-Goñi JM. Ferreira PL, et al. Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3163-3175. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02226-5. Epub 2019 Jun 14. Qual Life Res. 2019. PMID: 31201730
  • Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L in Jordan.
    Al Rabayah A, Roudijk B, Purba FD, Rencz F, Jaddoua S, Siebert U. Al Rabayah A, et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Apr;26(3):487-501. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01712-z. Epub 2024 Sep 3. Eur J Health Econ. 2025. PMID: 39225720 Free PMC article.
  • Cross-Country Analysis of EQ-5D Data.
    Szende A, Janssen B. Szende A, et al. 2013 Sep 19. In: Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J, editors. Self-Reported Population Health: An International Perspective based on EQ-5D [Internet]. Dordrecht (NL): Springer; 2014. Chapter 4. 2013 Sep 19. In: Szende A, Janssen B, Cabases J, editors. Self-Reported Population Health: An International Perspective based on EQ-5D [Internet]. Dordrecht (NL): Springer; 2014. Chapter 4. PMID: 29787185 Free Books & Documents. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37(1):53–72. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kennedy-Martin M, Slaap B, Herdman M, van Reenen M, Kennedy-Martin T, Greiner W, Busschbach J, Boye KS. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. Eur J Health Econ. 2020;21(8):1245–1257. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rencz F, Gulácsi L, Drummond M, Golicki D, Prevolnik Rupel V, Simon J, Stolk EA, Brodszky V, Baji P, Závada J, Petrova G, Rotar A, Péntek M. EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000–2015. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(11):2693–2710. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1375-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaur G, et al. Criteria used for priority-setting for public health resource allocation in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(6):474–483. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000473. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tarn Y-H, et al. Health-care systems and pharmacoeconomic research in Asia-Pacific region. Value Health. 2008;11:S137–S155. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00378.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources