Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 13;21(1):96.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01035-0.

Equilibrium in the governance of cross-sectoral policies: how does it translate into practice?

Pernelle Smits  1 , Johanne Préval  2 , Jean-Louis Denis  3 , Gerard Divay  2 , Jacques Bourgeault  2 , Nassera Touati  2
Affiliations
Review

Equilibrium in the governance of cross-sectoral policies: how does it translate into practice?

Pernelle Smits et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: There is growing interest from health researchers in the governance of Health in All Policies (HiAP). Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has re-ignited managers' interest in HiAP governance and in health prevention activities that involve actors from outside health ministries. Since the dynamics of these multi-actor, multi-sectoral policies are complex, the use of systems theory is a promising avenue toward understanding and improving HiAP governance. We focus on the concept of equilibrium within systems theory, especially as it points to the need to strike a balance between actors that goes beyond synergies or mimicry-a balance that is essential to HiAP governance.

Method: We mobilized two sources of data to understand how the concept of equilibrium applies to HiAP governance. First, we reviewed the literature on existing frameworks for collaborative governance, both in general and for HiAP specifically, in order to extract equilibrium-related elements. Second, we conducted an in-depth case study over three years of an HiAP implemented in Quebec, Canada.

Results: In total, we identified 12 equilibrium-related elements relevant to HiAP governance and related to knowledge, actors, learning, mindsets, sustainability, principles, coordination, funding and roles. The equilibria were both operational and conceptual in nature.

Conclusions: We conclude that policy makers and policy implementers could benefit from mobilizing these 12 equilibrium-related elements to enhance HiAP governance. Evaluators of HiAP may also want to consider and integrate them into their governance assessments.

Keywords: Equilibrium; Framework; Governance; HiAP; Horizontal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The data were initially collected under a contract with the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services.

References

    1. Wismar M, McQueen D, Lin V, Jones CM, Davies M. Intersectoral governance for health in all policies. Eurohealth. 2012;18(4):3–7.
    1. Shankardass K, Muntaner C, Kokkinen L, et al. The implementation of Health in All Policies initiatives: a systems framework for government action. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16:26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0295-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bilodeau A, Galarneau M, Lefebvre C, Potvin L. Linking process and effects of intersectoral action on local neighbourhoods: systemic modelling based on actor–network-theory. Sociol Health Illness (SHI) 2019;41(1):165–179. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12813. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bilodeau A, Potvin L. Unpacking complexity in public health interventions with actor-network theory. Health Promot Int. 2018;33(1):173–181. - PubMed
    1. Wernham A, Teutsch SM. Health in all policies for big cities. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S56–65. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000130. - DOI - PMC - PubMed