Role of Lactate Measurement in Flap Monitoring: An Useful Adjunct
- PMID: 37705814
- PMCID: PMC10497328
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769111
Role of Lactate Measurement in Flap Monitoring: An Useful Adjunct
Abstract
Background Detection of vascular compromise in flap is often a challenging task for reconstructive surgeons. A timely salvage procedure depends on objectivity and reliability of postoperative flap monitoring. This study determined if flap capillary lactate helps in prediction of flap viability in first 48 postoperative hours of surgery. Methods We conducted this study on all flaps with accessible skin paddle where capillary lactate values were assessed along with clinical observation to check viability of flap at 0, 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours of surgery. The data was statistically analyzed for significance and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used for calculating cutoff value for lactate. Results Out of a total of 30 patients included in this study, 25 were males and the mean age was 45.03 years. Fifteen patients underwent free flap and rest pedicled. Highly significant association of role of clinical observation in the outcome of flap was found. The average of lactate values for survived and distally ischemic flap was 5.32 ± 1.91 and 8.38 ± 1.81, respectively, which was highly significant. The cutoff value of lactate below which all flaps survived was found to be 6.09 mmol/L. Conclusion Flap capillary lactate measurement is an easy, quick, cost-effective, and objective tool for checking viability of flaps.
Keywords: flap capillary lactate; flap ischemia; flap monitoring; free flaps; vascular thrombosis of flap.
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ).
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Crawley M B, Sweeny L, Ravipati P et al.Factors associated with free flap failures in head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;161(04):598–604. - PubMed
-
- Bui D T, Cordeiro P G, Hu Q Y, Disa J J, Pusic A, Mehrara B J. Free flap reexploration: indications, treatment, and outcomes in 1193 free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(07):2092–2100. - PubMed
-
- Chao A H, Meyerson J, Povoski S P, Kocak E. A review of devices used in the monitoring of microvascular free tissue transfers. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10(05):649–660. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources