Consumers' Preferences for Purchasing mHealth Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment
- PMID: 37707310
- PMCID: PMC10510454
- DOI: 10.2196/25908
Consumers' Preferences for Purchasing mHealth Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment
Abstract
Background: There is growing interest in mobile health apps; however, not all of them have been successful. The most common issue has been users' nonadoption or abandonment of health apps because the app designs do not meet their preferences. Therefore, to facilitate design-preference fit, understanding consumers' preferences for health apps is necessary, which can be accomplished by using a discrete choice experiment.
Objective: This study aims to examine consumer preferences for health apps and how these preferences differ across individuals with different sociodemographic characteristics and health app usage and purchase experiences.
Methods: A cross-sectional discrete choice experiment questionnaire survey was conducted with 593 adults living in Hong Kong. A total of 7 health app attributes that might affect consumers' preferences for health apps were examined, including usefulness, ease of use, security and privacy, health care professionals' attitudes, smartphone storage consumption, mobile data consumption, and cost. Mixed-effect logit regressions were used to examine how these attributes affected consumer preferences for health apps. Fixed effects (coefficient β) of the attributes and random effects of individual differences were modeled. Subgroup analyses of consumer preferences by sex, age, household income, education level, and health app usage and purchase experiences were conducted.
Results: Cost was the attribute that had the greatest effect on consumers' choice of health apps (compared to HK $10 [US $1.27]-HK $50 [US $6.37]: β=-1.064; P<.001; HK $100 [US $12.75]: β=-2.053; P<.001), followed by security and privacy (compared to no security insurance-some security policies: β=.782; P<.001; complete security system: β=1.164; P<.001) and usefulness (compared to slightly useful-moderately useful: β=.234; P<.001; very useful: β=.979; P=.007), mobile data consumption (compared to data-consuming-a bit data-consuming: β=.647; P<.001; data-saving: β=.815; P<.001), smartphone storage consumption (compared to >100 MB-around 38 MB: β=.334; P<.001; <10 MB: β=.511; P<.001), and attitudes of health care professionals (compared to neutral-moderately supportive: β=.301; P<.001; very supportive: β=.324; P<.001). In terms of ease of use, consumers preferred health apps that were moderately easy to use (compared to not easy to use-moderately easy to use: β=.761; P<.001; very easy to use: β=.690; P<.001). Our results also showed that consumers with different sociodemographic characteristics and different usage and purchase experiences with health apps differed in their preferences for health apps.
Conclusions: It is recommended that future health apps keep their mobile data and phone storage consumption low, include a complete security system to protect personal health information, provide useful content and features, adopt user-friendly interfaces, and involve health care professionals. In addition, health app developers should identify the characteristics of their intended users and design and develop health apps to fit the preferences of the intended users.
Keywords: DCE; consumer preferences; digital health; discrete choice experiment; mHealth; mobile health.
© Zhenzhen Xie, Calvin Kalun Or. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org).
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
A discrete choice experiment to examine the factors influencing consumers' willingness to purchase health apps.Mhealth. 2023 Jul 3;9:21. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-39. eCollection 2023. Mhealth. 2023. PMID: 37492118 Free PMC article.
-
The Reviews Are in: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Consumer Perspectives on Apps for Bipolar Disorder.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 7;19(4):e105. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7273. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28389420 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Monitoring App Preferences for Sun Protection: Discrete Choice Experiment Survey Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 27;22(11):e18889. doi: 10.2196/18889. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33245282 Free PMC article.
-
User perceptions of mobile digital apps for mental health: Acceptability and usability - An integrative review.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Feb;29(1):147-168. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12744. Epub 2021 Mar 18. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022. PMID: 33604946 Review.
-
Menstrual Tracking Mobile App Review by Consumers and Health Care Providers: Quality Evaluations Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Mar 1;11:e40921. doi: 10.2196/40921. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023. PMID: 36857125 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
What to Consider When Developing Multidomain Mobile Health Interventions for Lifestyle Management.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 25;13:e63573. doi: 10.2196/63573. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025. PMID: 40854233 Free PMC article.
-
A choice based conjoint analysis of mobile healthcare application preferences among physicians, patients, and individuals.NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 3;8(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01610-5. NPJ Digit Med. 2025. PMID: 40319176 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences for Mobile App Features to Support People Living With Chronic Heart Diseases: Discrete Choice Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 25;13:e58556. doi: 10.2196/58556. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025. PMID: 40279501 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous