Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr;34(4):2480-2486.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10211-3. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

To shield or not to shield: shielding may have unintended effects on patient dose in CT

Affiliations

To shield or not to shield: shielding may have unintended effects on patient dose in CT

Heli Riitta Sinikka Larjava et al. Eur Radiol. 2024 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the patient out-of-plane shield is to reduce the patient radiation dose. Its effect on tube current modulation was evaluated with the out-of-plane shield visible in the localizer but absent in the scan range in chest CT with different CT scanners.

Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with six different CT scanners from three different vendors. The chest was first scanned without any shielding, and then with the out-of-plane shield within the localizer but outside the imaged volume. All pitch values of each scanner were used. The tube current values with and without the out-of-plane shield were collected and used to evaluate the effect of overscanning and tube current modulation (TCM) on patient radiation dose.

Results: The highest increase in cumulative mA was 217%, when the pitch was 1.531. The tube current value increased already 8.9 cm before the end of the scanned anatomy and the difference between the tube current of the last slices (with and without the out-of-plane shield in the localizer) was 976%.

Conclusion: Applying an out-of-plane shield outside the scanned volume but visible in the localizer images may increase the patient dose considerably if the scanner's TCM function is based only on localizer images.

Clinical relevance statement: The use of an out-of-plane shield in CT may strongly increase the tube current modulation and thus provide the patient with a higher radiation dose.

Key points: • Applying an out-of-plane shield outside the scanned volume but visible in the localizer images may increase patient radiation dose considerably. • The effect is visible with scanners that use solely localizer-based tube current modulation. • Features like overscanning may be difficult for the user to notice when planning the scanning, and yet they may affect tube current modulation and through it to patient dose.

Keywords: Chest; Computed tomography; Phantom; Radiation dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The contact shield placement 1 cm below the imaged volume on the Kyoto phantom. Shield was visible in localizer images but not included in the scanned volume
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Tube current as a function of the slice, imaged using TCM and with all pitch values available at each scanner. Here we present the most notable differences in average mA values per image measured in our study. Location 0 cm represents a superior direction of a patient. (a) GE Optima 660, (b) Canon Aquilion Prime
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The tube current increase visualized over phantom anatomy. Blue horizontal lines represent the anatomical area in the phantom, which was exposed over 20% difference between the average tube current of the slice without and with an out-of-field shield in the localizer. The total length of the imaged volume was 32 cm (between vertical lines) and the earliest increase was detected 9.7 cm before the end of the scan

References

    1. European Commission (2015) Radiation Protection No 180. Medical radiation exposure of the European population, Part 1/2. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. 10.2833/708119
    1. United Nations (2011) Summary of low-dose radiation effects on health. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Vienna. Available via https://www.unscear.org/unscear/uploads/documents/unscear-reports/UNSCEA.... Accessed 11 Dec 2021
    1. Mettler FA, Jr, Mahesh M, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, et al. Patient exposure from radiologic and nuclear medicine procedures in the United States: procedure volume and effective dose for the period 2006–2016. Radiology. 2020;295:418–427. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192256. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Commission on Radiation Protection (2013) ICRP Publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology. Ann. ICRP 42(2) - PubMed
    1. International Atomic Energy Agency (2018) Radiation protection and safety in medical uses of ionizing radiation. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. Available via https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/PUB1775_web.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2022