Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 14;18(9):e0290509.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290509. eCollection 2023.

Implementing physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) food labelling: Views of a nationally representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom

Amanda J Daley  1 , Victoria E Kettle  1 , Andrea K Roalfe  1
Affiliations

Implementing physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) food labelling: Views of a nationally representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom

Amanda J Daley et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Nutritional labels aim to support people to make informed healthy food choices, but many people do not understand the meaning of calories on food labels. Another approach is to provide calorie information with an interpretation of what the calorie content of food means for energy expenditure, known as physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) labelling. PACE aims to illustrate how many minutes of physical activity are equivalent to the calories contained in food/drinks. This study investigated the views of the public about the possible implementation of PACE labelling.

Methods: Data was obtained from a nationally representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom and collected by UK Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Panellists are recruited via a random probability unclustered address-based sampling method. 4,000 panellists were randomly invited to participate and asked to compare their views about traffic light and PACE labelling preferences and behaviour parameters.

Results: Data were analysed descriptively and using logistic and multinomial regression analyses. 2,668/4,000 (67%) of those invited participated. More participants preferred traffic light (43%vs33%) than PACE labelling, but more reported PACE was easier to understand (41%vs27%) and more likely to catch their attention (49%vs31%). More participants thought PACE was more likely to help them avoid high calorie food than traffic light labelling (44%vs28%). Physically active (3-4 or 5+ days/week) respondents were more likely to report PACE would catch their attention than traffic light labelling, compared with less active participants (weighted adjusted relative risk ratio = 1.42 (1.00-2.00) and 1.45 (1.03-2.05 respectively)). Perceived overweight was the most predictive factor (weighted adjusted OR = 2.24 (1.19 to 4.20)) in whether PACE was considered useful in helping people decide what to eat/buy.

Conclusion: The public identified value to their health in labelling food with PACE information. PACE labelling may be a useful approach to complement current approaches to food labelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Example of PACE labelling (1).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Example of PACE labelling (2).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organisation (2020) Obesity. https://www.who.int/news-room/facts-in-pictures/detail/6-facts-on-obesit... (accessed 14th October 2020).
    1. Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F (1999) Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med 29, 563–570. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0585 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Food Standards Agency (2018) Nutrition labelling. https://www.food.gov.uk/business-guidance/nutrition-labelling#front-of-p... (accessed 24th December 2021).
    1. World Health Organization (2002) Global strategy on diet, physical activity, and health. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_englis... (accessed 27th November 2018).
    1. Zlatevska N, Neumann N, Dubelaar C (2018) Mandatory calorie disclosure: A comprehensive analysis of its effect on consumers and retailers. J Retailing 94, 89–101. 10.1016/j.jretai.2017.09.007 - DOI

Publication types