Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;51(3):1974-1984.
doi: 10.1002/mp.16738. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

Deformable lung 4DCT image registration via landmark-driven cycle network

Affiliations

Deformable lung 4DCT image registration via landmark-driven cycle network

Luke Matkovic et al. Med Phys. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: An automated, accurate, and efficient lung four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) image registration method is clinically important to quantify respiratory motion for optimal motion management.

Purpose: The purpose of this work is to develop a weakly supervised deep learning method for 4DCT lung deformable image registration (DIR).

Methods: The landmark-driven cycle network is proposed as a deep learning platform that performs DIR of individual phase datasets in a simulation 4DCT. This proposed network comprises a generator and a discriminator. The generator accepts moving and target CTs as input and outputs the deformation vector fields (DVFs) to match the two CTs. It is optimized during both forward and backward paths to enhance the bi-directionality of DVF generation. Further, the landmarks are used to weakly supervise the generator network. Landmark-driven loss is used to guide the generator's training. The discriminator then judges the realism of the deformed CT to provide extra DVF regularization.

Results: We performed four-fold cross-validation on 10 4DCT datasets from the public DIR-Lab dataset and a hold-out test on our clinic dataset, which included 50 4DCT datasets. The DIR-Lab dataset was used to evaluate the performance of the proposed method against other methods in the literature by calculating the DIR-Lab Target Registration Error (TRE). The proposed method outperformed other deep learning-based methods on the DIR-Lab datasets in terms of TRE. Bi-directional and landmark-driven loss were shown to be effective for obtaining high registration accuracy. The mean and standard deviation of TRE for the DIR-Lab datasets was 1.20 ± 0.72 mm and the mean absolute error (MAE) and structural similarity index (SSIM) for our datasets were 32.1 ± 11.6 HU and 0.979 ± 0.011, respectively.

Conclusion: The landmark-driven cycle network has been validated and tested for automatic deformable image registration of patients' lung 4DCTs with results comparable to or better than competing methods.

Keywords: deep learning; deformable image registration; lung CT; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of the proposed landmark-driven cycle network-based registration method. The black arrows denote the feed forward path in both the training and inference procedures. The blue dashed arrows denote the feed forward path for only the training procedure. The red dashed arrows denote the supervision.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Network architecture of the mutual network.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a1): EI phase, (b1): EE phase and ground truth, (b2): fusion image between EI (moving) and EE (target) phases, (b3): difference image between EI and EE phases. (c1, d1): deformed images via proposed method without landmark-driven supervision, and with landmark-driven supervision, respectively. (c2, d2): fusion images between deformed images of the two variant methods and the target phase. (c3, d3): intensity difference images between deformed images of the two variant methods and target phase. For fusion images, red represents the target image while green represents the moving image. Yellow represents intensity agreement, indicating good alignment between the fixed and deformed images. The window level of CT images is set to [−1000, 200] HU. The window level of difference images is set to [−300, 300] HU.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2021;71(1):7–33. - PubMed
    1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2019;69(5):363–385. - PubMed
    1. Keall PJ, Mageras GS, Balter JM, et al. The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76 [published online ahead of print 2006/11/09]. Med Phys. 2006;33(10):3874–3900. - PubMed
    1. Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101 [published online ahead of print 2010/10/01]. Med Phys. 2010;37(8):4078–4101. - PubMed
    1. Keall P 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging and treatment planning [published online ahead of print 2004/01/31]. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14(1):81–90. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources