Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1986 Nov;54(2):303-7.
doi: 10.1128/iai.54.2.303-307.1986.

Toxicity and induction of resistance to Listeria monocytogenes infection by amphotericin B in inbred strains of mice

Comparative Study

Toxicity and induction of resistance to Listeria monocytogenes infection by amphotericin B in inbred strains of mice

J Brajtburg et al. Infect Immun. 1986 Nov.

Abstract

Amphotericin B (AmB) treatment before infection with the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes prolonged survival of AKR mice but shortened survival of C57BL/6 mice compared with survival of untreated infected controls. C57BL/6 mice were also more sensitive to the acute toxic effects of AmB than AKR mice, as were (C57BL/6 X AKR)F1 hybrid mice. Spleen cells and erythrocytes (RBCs) from the C57BL/6 and the F1 hybrid mice were both more sensitive to the lytic and lethal effects of AmB than corresponding cells from AKR mice. Biochemical analysis indicated that catalase levels in RBCs from C57BL/6 and F1 hybrid mice were about 60% of those found in RBCs from AKR mice. The lysis by AmB of RBCs from all these strains of mice was inhibited by catalase or incubation in a low-oxygen environment. These findings suggest that (i) the low catalase levels in C57BL/6 and F1 hybrid mice may limit the protection of cells from the oxidant damage involved in AmB action, and (ii) the toxicity which occurs at low concentrations of AmB in the mouse strains with low intracellular catalase levels may interfere with or ablate the AmB-induced increases in mouse resistance to L. monocytogenes infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Enzyme. 1971;12(2):219-25 - PubMed
    1. J Lipid Res. 1965 Jul;6:428-31 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1973 Apr;127(4):373-7 - PubMed
    1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1974 Sep;146(4):1166-72 - PubMed
    1. J Lab Clin Med. 1975 Feb;85(2):337-41 - PubMed

Publication types