Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec;54(6):667-688.
doi: 10.1111/age.13355. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

Landmarks in the history of selective sweeps

Affiliations
Review

Landmarks in the history of selective sweeps

Manjit Panigrahi et al. Anim Genet. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Half a century ago, a seminal article on the hitchhiking effect by Smith and Haigh inaugurated the concept of the selection signature. Selective sweeps are characterised by the rapid spread of an advantageous genetic variant through a population and hence play an important role in shaping evolution and research on genetic diversity. The process by which a beneficial allele arises and becomes fixed in a population, leading to a increase in the frequency of other linked alleles, is known as genetic hitchhiking or genetic draft. Kimura's neutral theory and hitchhiking theory are complementary, with Kimura's neutral evolution as the 'null model' and positive selection as the 'signal'. Both are widely accepted in evolution, especially with genomics enabling precise measurements. Significant advances in genomic technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, high-density SNP arrays and powerful bioinformatics tools, have made it possible to systematically investigate selection signatures in a variety of species. Although the history of selection signatures is relatively recent, progress has been made in the last two decades, owing to the increasing availability of large-scale genomic data and the development of computational methods. In this review, we embark on a journey through the history of research on selective sweeps, ranging from early theoretical work to recent empirical studies that utilise genomic data.

Keywords: livestock genomics; machine learning; population genetics; selection signatures; selective sweep.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Akey, J.M., Zhang, G., Zhang, K., Jin, L. & Shriver, M.D. (2002) Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Research, 12(12), 1805-1814.
    1. Alachiotis, N., Stamatakis, A. & Pavlidis, P. (2012) OmegaPlus: a scalable tool for rapid detection of selective sweeps in whole-genome datasets. Bioinformatics, 28(17), 2274-2275.
    1. Antao, T., Lopes, L. & Beja-Pereira, L. (2008) LOSITAN: a workbench to detect molecular adaptation based on a Fst-outlier method. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(1), 323.
    1. Barton, N.H. (1998) The effect of hitchhiking on neutral genealogies. Genetics Research, 72(2), 123-133.
    1. Begun, D.J. & Aquadro, C.F. (1992) Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature, 356(6369), 519-520.

LinkOut - more resources