Transfusion-associated adverse events incidence and severity after the implementation of an active hemovigilance program with 24 h follow-up. A prospective cohort study
- PMID: 37711059
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.17538
Transfusion-associated adverse events incidence and severity after the implementation of an active hemovigilance program with 24 h follow-up. A prospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Hemovigilance (HV) is usually based on voluntary reports (passive HV). Our aim is to ascertain credible incidence, severity, and mortality of transfusion-associated adverse events (TAAEs) using an active HV program.
Study design and methods: Prospective cohort study to estimate transfusion risk after 46,488 transfusions in 5830 patients, using an active HV program with follow-up within the first 24 h after transfusion. We compared these results to those with the previously established passive HV program during the same 30 months of the study. We explored factors associated with the occurrence of TAAEs using generalized estimating equations models.
Results: With the active HV program TAAEs incidence was 57.3 (95% CI, 50.5-64.2) and mortality 1.1 (95% CI, 0.13-2.01) per 10,000 transfusions. Incidence with the new surveillance model was 14.0 times higher than with the passive. Most events occurred when transfusions had already finished (60.2%); especially pulmonary events (80.4%). Three out of five deaths and 50.3% of severe TAAEs were pulmonary. In the multivariate analysis surgical patients had half TAAEs risk when compared to medical patients (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.78) and women had nearly twice the risk of a pulmonary event compared to men (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.03-3.32). Patient's age, blood component type, or blood component shelf-life were unrelated to TAAEs risk.
Discussion: Active hemovigilance programs provide additional data which may lead to better recognition and understanding of TAAEs and their frequency and severity.
Keywords: RBC transfusion; transfusion complications-non infectious; transfusion practices (adult).
© 2023 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Snyder EL, Stramer SL, Benjamin RJ. The safety of the blood supply-time to raise the bar. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1882-1885. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1500154
-
- Carson JL, Triulzi DJ, Ness PM. Indications for and adverse effects of red-cell transfusion. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1261-1272. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1612789
-
- Narayan S, editor. D Poles et al. on behalf of the serious hazards of transfusion (SHOT) steering group. The 2019 annual SHOT report. (2020). https://www.shotuk.org/wp-content/uploads/myimages/SHOT-REPORT-2019-Fina...
-
- Knutson F, Osselaer J, Pierelli L, Lozano M, Cid J, Tardivel R, et al. A prospective, active haemovigilance study with combined cohort analysis of 19 175 transfusions of platelet components prepared with amotosalen-UVA photochemical treatment. Vox Sang. 2015;109:343-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.12287
-
- Andreu G, Boudjedir K, Muller JY, Pouchol E, Ozier Y, Fevre G, et al. Analysis of transfusion-related acute lung injury and possible transfusion-related acute lung injury reported to the French Hemovigilance network from 2007 to 2013. Transfus Med Rev. 2018;32:16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2017.07.001
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
