Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 7:64:102140.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102140. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein nanoparticle vaccine GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03: interim results of a randomised, active-controlled, observer-blinded, phase 3 trial

Collaborators, Affiliations

Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein nanoparticle vaccine GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03: interim results of a randomised, active-controlled, observer-blinded, phase 3 trial

Joon Young Song et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: GBP510 vaccine contains self-assembling, recombinant nanoparticles displaying SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domains. We report interim phase 3 immunogenicity results for GBP510 adjuvanted with AS03 (GBP510/AS03) compared with ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca) in healthy adults aged ≥18 years, up to 6 months after the second dose.

Methods: This was a randomised, active-controlled, observer-blinded, parallel group, phase 3 study, conducted at 38 sites across six countries (South Korea, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Ukraine and New Zealand). Cohort 1 (no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 vaccination) was randomised 2:1 to receive two doses of GBP510/AS03 or ChAdOx1-S (immunogenicity and safety), while Cohort 2 (regardless of baseline serostatus) was randomised 5:1 (safety). Primary objectives were to demonstrate superiority in geometric mean titre (GMT) and non-inferiority in seroconversion rate (SCR; ≥4-fold rise from baseline) of GBP510/AS03 vs. ChAdOx1-S for neutralising antibodies against the ancestral strain by live-virus neutralisation assay. Secondary objectives included assessment of safety and reactogenicity (long-term 6 months cut-off date: 09 August 2022). This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05007951).

Findings: Between 30 August 2021 and 11 January 2022, a total of 4913 participants were screened and 4036 participants (1956 in Cohort 1 and 2080 in Cohort 2) who met eligibility criteria were enrolled and randomised to receive 2 doses of GBP510/AS03 (n = 3039) or ChAdOx1-S (n = 997). Most participants were Southeast Asian (81.5%) and aged 18-64 years (94.7%). The primary objectives assessed in per-protocol set included 877 participants in GBP510/AS03 and 441 in ChAdOx1-S group: at 2 weeks after the second vaccination, the GMT ratio (GBP510/AS03/ChAdOx1-S) in per-protocol set was 2.93 (95% CI 2.63-3.27), demonstrating superiority (95% CI lower limit >1) of GBP510/AS03; the between-group SCR difference of 10.8% (95% CI 7.68-14.32) also satisfied the non-inferiority criterion (95% CI lower limit > -5%). Neutralizing antibody titres sustained higher for the GBP510/AS03 group compared to the ChAdOx1-S group through 6 months after the second vaccination. In Safety analysis (Cohort 1 & 2), the proportion of participants with adverse events (AEs) after any vaccination was higher with GBP510/AS03 vs. ChAdOx1-S for solicited local AEs (56.7% vs. 49.2%), but was similar for solicited systemic AEs (51.2% vs. 53.5%) and unsolicited AEs (13.3% vs. 14.6%) up to 28 days after the second vaccination. No safety concerns were identified during follow-up for 6 months after the second vaccination.

Interpretation: Our interim findings suggested that GBP510/AS03 met the superiority criterion for neutralising antibodies and non-inferiority criterion for SCR compared with ChAdOx1-S, and showed a clinically acceptable safety profile.

Funding: This work was supported, in whole or in part, by funding from CEPI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Investments INV-010680 and INV-006462. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation supported this project for the generation of IND-enabling data and CEPI supported this clinical study.

Keywords: COVID-19; Immunogenicity; Nanoparticle vaccine; Recombinant protein vaccine; SARS-CoV-2; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FR, TB, and PW are employees of the GSK group of companies. FR and TB hold restricted shares in the GSK group of companies. HK, JHR, SJL, and YWP are full-time employees of SK Bioscience. HK, YWP and JHR own SK Bioscience stock as employees. SS, MS and ND are full-time employees of IVI. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study diagram. After randomization, total 11 participants were not treated with study vaccine and not included in the safety set (8 requested to be withdrawn; 2 excluded due to significant non-compliance with the protocol–i.e., COVID-19 infection and receiving prohibited vaccination after randomization; 1 excluded due to safety concerns–i.e., mild degree of fever after randomization and within 72 h prior to 1st vaccination). FAS, full analysis set; PPS, per-protocol set.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Boxplots and individual data for the natural logarithmic titre by live virus neutralisation assay at baseline (visit 2), 4 weeks after first vaccination (visit 4), and 2 weeks after second vaccination (visit 6) (per-protocol set). A total of 877 participants in GBP510/AS03 and 441 participants in ChAdOx1-S were evaluated for Neutralization antibody by FRNT ND50 (Unit: IU/mL). Visit 4 (4 weeks after first vaccination) assessment was conducted only in the subset population, comprised of approximately 20% of PPS population (195 and 96 participants from GBP510/AS03 and ChAdOx1-S, respectively). The adjusted post vaccination GMTs was used in the superiority test. FRNT, focus reduction neutralisation test; PPS, per-protocol set; GMT, geometric mean titre.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Incidence rates for solicited local (A) and systemic (B) adverse events within 7 days after each-dose vaccination. Denominator of percentage is the number of participants in each group. Adverse events are displayed as ‘number of participants (percentage of participants)’. If one participant experienced the same adverse event more than once, the adverse event is counted only once with the most severe category.

References

    1. Fiolet T., Kherabi Y., MacDonald C.J., Ghosn J., Peiffer-Smadja N. Comparing COVID-19 vaccines for their characteristics, efficacy and effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28:202–221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walls A.C., Fiala B., Schäfer A., et al. Elicitation of potent neutralizing antibody responses by designed protein nanoparticle vaccines for SARS-COV-2. Cell. 2020;183(5):1367. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.043. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walls A.C., Miranda M.C., Schäfer A., et al. Elicitation of broadly protective sarbecovirus immunity by receptor-binding domain nanoparticle vaccines. Cell. 2021;184(21):5432. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morel S., Didierlaurent A., Bourguignon P., et al. Adjuvant system AS03 containing alpha-tocopherol modulates innate immune response and leads to improved adaptive immunity. Vaccine. 2011;29:2461–2473. - PubMed
    1. Song J.Y., Choi W.S., Heo J.Y., et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein nanoparticle vaccine (GBP510) adjuvanted with AS03: a randomised, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded phase 1/2 trial. eClinicalMedicine. 2022;51 - PMC - PubMed

Associated data