Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;170(2):535-543.
doi: 10.1002/ohn.517. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

Disparities in Newborn Hearing Screening Outcomes in the United States From 2007 to 2017

Affiliations

Disparities in Newborn Hearing Screening Outcomes in the United States From 2007 to 2017

Katie L Gutierrez et al. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Establishing timely language intervention for children who are deaf or hard of hearing is crucial for their cognitive and language development. Newborn hearing screening (NBHS) programs are now commonplace, but disparities in receipt of support may exist. This study seeks to investigate if states with more diverse populations, less educated mothers, fewer resources, and no legislative mandate of screening have lower rates of milestone completion.

Study design: This is a cross-sectional study.

Setting: Data describing screening, identification, and intervention rates from individual state NBHS programs were aggregated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 2007 to 2017.

Methods: Regression models were fitted to assess associations between these outcomes and state demographic and policy variables. Forest plots from meta-analyses were used to obtain nationwide pooled estimates of the relative risk (RR) of maternal predictors from individual state data.

Results: State averages of maternal education level, age, and race/ethnicity were found to be significantly associated with various outcomes. The presence of program funding and legislative state mandate were associated with multiple improved outcomes. Meta-analyses identified increased RRs for most outcomes based on maternal education less than high school, age 19 and below, and non-White race/ethnicity.

Conclusion: There is evidence of disparities in access to and timing of screening, identification testing, and intervention by various demographic and policy factors at the state level. More research is needed to further explore these relationships and determine how to address existing disparities in order to provide more equitable care.

Keywords: deaf or hard of hearing; disparities; early hearing detection and intervention; newborn hearing screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tomblin JB, Harrison M, Ambrose SE, Walker EA, Oleson JJ, Moeller MP. Language outcomes in young children with mild to severe hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2015;36(suppl 1):76S-91S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000219
    1. Nott P, Cowan R, Brown PM, Wigglesworth G. Early language development in children with profound hearing loss fitted with a device at a young age: part I-the time period taken to acquire first words and first word combinations. Ear Hear. 2009;30(5):526-540. doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181a9ea14
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). Effects of hearing loss on development. February 25, 2011. Accessed April 26, 2020. https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/effects-of-hearing-loss-on-development/
    1. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Wiggin M, Chung W. Early hearing detection and vocabulary of children with hearing loss. Pediatrics. 2017;140(2):e20162964. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2964
    1. Vohr B, Jodoin-Krauzyk J, Tucker R, et al. Expressive vocabulary of children with hearing loss in the first 2 years of life: impact of early intervention. J Perinatol. 2011;31(4):274-280. doi:10.1038/jp.2010.110

LinkOut - more resources